Quantcast
Channel: A Wasted Life
Viewing all 690 articles
Browse latest View live

Camp Blood (USA, 1999)

$
0
0

The fact of the matter is, not all shit stinks equally. Take for example, films like The Wickeds (2005) or Final Hour (1995): total shit, both films, and they stink like a putrid, diarrhea-smeared anus in a land without water on a person without arms. Final Hour we'll toss out of the discussion here, because it probably had a budget (and we hate it too much to bother talking about). True, The Wickeds had a budget, too, but it was small: $50,000. Camp Blood, we are sure, had a smaller budget — hell, did it even have one? And like The Wickeds it is, indeed, total shit: shitty enough that you could probably use it to fertilize enough land to feed all of Africa with healthy grains and vegetables. Yep, it is a truly atrocious, direct-to-video slasher.
But, you know what? It doesn't really stink; in this sense, it's a bit like your own farts when you're hung-over and home alone. Camp Blood is a true, blue-blooded bad film, the type of crappy film that is so shitty, so indescribably incompetent, that it becomes enjoyable; it becomes a laughable comedy of cheap blood, bad acting, narrative and directorial inability, and total cinematic error. It is a masterpiece of everything that a good film should not be. We loved it — but we'll be damned if we can actually recommend it.
Where should we begin — or, perhaps, why should we bother? We bother because, well, dunno. (Because we were molested by a priest as a child? Because we weren't? Who knows why, we just do.)But let us begin with the title, the reference of which is as obvious as the movie's plot is unoriginal, derivative, and predictable: "Camp Blood", of course, is the nickname of Camp Crystal Lake, the location of events in the original and classic Friday the 13th (1980 / trailer). And like that film, and so many others, Camp Blood starts out with a couple who have sex and thus must die.
Here, two birdwatchers are underway in search of a rare egg-laying feathered vertebrate when they decide to have sex in the forest. They practice a strange form of safe sex in which neither ever removes their trousers, but both remove their tops, and thus the film begins with its only (and prolonged) topless female scene — and what a fine, fully natural set she has! A set that "director" Brad Sykes (who also "wrote" the movie) focuses on with unadulterated exploitive fascination — here, at the latest, if the unprofessionalism of the acting and camerawork hasn't yet let the unsuspecting viewer realize that the movie has low artistic goals and merit, it becomes obvious that Sykes is a trash filmmaker of exceptionally rock-bottom intentions. 
The couple, of course, dies at the machete of the film's killer clown (played by "Shemp Moseley") — oddly enough, however, later in the film, after enough time has passed that the couple's disappearance could even be noted in the newspaper, the female half is discovered, still alive, by two hunting rednecks, Gus (Ron Ford) and George (Tim Sullivan, supposedly of The Laughing Dead [1989]). They, too, never make it out of the forest.
As mundane as the opening, so is the plot: two couples — a nice one, Tricia (Jennifer Ritchkoff, a terrible actress, but good by comparison to the rest of the bunch) and Steve (Michael Taylor), and a dicky one, Jay (Tim Young of Scarecrow [2002 / trailer]) and Nicole (Betheny Zolt of Serum [2006 / trailer]) — go camping together to Camp Blackwood, aka Camp Blood, and ignore the warnings of a local nutcase, Thatcher (Joseph Haggerty), that nothing good will come of going there. Following their butch lesbian guide Harris (Courtney Taylor of Prom Night III: The Last Kiss [1990 / trailer]) deep into the woods, the morning after a round of campfire ghost stories in which we learn the origin of the killer clown, the bodycount begins...
High points of the movie (aside from the fab, all-natural bouncers that open the movie) include the fact that there really isn't a campsite (they simply camp out in the forest); the total lack of realism of their hike (no food or hiking gear, but Nicole's trunk full of clothing, although tents magically appear later); Nicole breaks her leg by tapping it against a log; Steve, convinced that size doesn't matter, runs after the killer clown only — since size does matter — to die a death that is obviously a homage to the classic machete-in-the-head scene of the original Dawn of the Dead (1978 / trailer); the fact that the group is "lost" in an area where graffiti is on the rocks and a huge overpass can be seen in the distance; canned music of the most generic form (supposedly "composed" by "Ghost"); the acting of Joseph Haggerty ("Thatcher"), who performs as if he were in a Monty Python sketch (which much of the movie could pass as); a locked car that suddenly opens and can be driven without keys; one effective death that is actually unexpected in how it plays out; and the multiple twists at the end which move the entire flick into the realm of hilarious mental mind-fuck — writer/director Brad Sykes either couldn't figure out how to end the film, or was incapable of deciding which ending he wanted.
If, in any way, we have made Camp Blood sound like a good movie, don't be fooled! It is a total piece of foul flotsam, despite the visually pleasing look of the killer. But, although the flick is total 100% feculence, we found ourselves laughing heartily quiet often over the course of its hackneyed, unoriginal, and incompetently filmed tale. Some might find that the movie has a slight and distasteful tinge of anti-lesbianism, but while that is arguably true, it isn't as in your face as, say, in Alexandre Aja's far-better made High Tension (2003 / trailer), if only because it almost gets lost in the all-over-the-place grand finale.
Unbelievably enough, Camp Blood has since spanned three follow-up movies: Brad Sykes'Camp Blood II (2000 / German "trailer") and Within the Woods (2005 / trailer), and Mark Polonia's Camp Blood: First Slaughter (2014 / trailer). It would seem that like penicillin-resistant gonorrhea, Camp Blood just doesn't want to go away...

Trailer of Promise – Films We Haven't Seen: The Pink Angels (1971)

$
0
0
DVD Drive-In points out the obvious about The Pink Angels, "the world's only gay biker [feature] film": "The Pink Angels is a film most can't believe was actually written, directed, acted, and released to theaters! Who was the audience for this film?" People like us, probably.

Get ready for ten pounds of dangling fury!”


Balladeer's Blog is of the opinion that The Pink Angels, with its "70's version of camp with a premise and plot elements that would have been banned in previous decades", "is not a gay-bashing film. Instead, it's in the tradition of the many 'anti-establishment' films from back then with the gay bikers presented in a sympathetic way and the 'straights' as the heavies."
We personally have our doubts regarding how empowering this movie is, but the trailer is odd enough to garner our interest. By the looks of the trailer, we would place this comedy somewhere in the school of Glen or Glenda (1953 / trailer) incompetence or Let Me Die a Woman (1977 / trailer) off-the-mark sympathy — you know, like your cousin who says "I think all fag should be allowed to marry." But until we've seen it, we'll give The Pink Angelsa benefit of the doubt.
Over at Trailers from Hell, Larry Karaszewski is of the opinion that The Pink Angels truly is from hell, that it's "one of the most aimless and boring films ever made", is unwatchable, and the trailer is the best thing about it. Trash Film Guru, on the other hand, says "give The Pink Angels a go right now. It's quite literally unlike anything else ever made."
Director Larry G. Brown (credited as "Lawrence Brown") went on to do two more forgotten films of note — the infamous horror An Eye for an Eye aka The Psychopath (1973 / "Oh, boy! Chocolate cake!") and the forgotten comedy Silent but Deadly (1986), about "America's first black, Jewish and female president [who] must save the nation from a smelly and lethal threat"— but doesn't seem to have been very active since his 2007 TV movie, The Rangers. The cast of The Pink Angels includes the token Afro-American Ronnie (Maurice Warfield), Henri (Robert Biheller), Arnold (Bruce Kimball of Dracula Vs. Frankenstein [1971] and many more noteworthy psychotronic films), Arnold's lover Eddie (Henry Olek, who in 2011 directed & co-wrote the horror movie The Guest Room aka Serving Up Richard [trailer]), and David (Tom Basham, 16 May 1942 - 29 July 2010, of Colossus: The Forbin Project [1970 / trailer]).

Ten Best Films in 2015

$
0
0
GIF from the probably NSFW tumblr weirdgifsystem.
Year 7 of A Wasted Life's "Ten Best Films of [Last Year]" list... the rules:
1. The films need not be made in the year in question (2015), they need only to have been viewed for the first time and reviewed that same year.
2. They need not even be "good" films: they need only to have left an exceptional impression or been in some way memorable enough while watching that they achieved a level of "unforgettableness" that makes them, in our non-humble opinion, worth watching — if only one time. (Good bad films rule!)
3. Short Films of the Month are as a rule excluded from the list, one: because simply by dent of the fact that their being chosen as a Short Film of the Month already makes them recommended, and two: the "Ten Best" list is for feature-length films only.
4. The order in which the films are presented is immaterial. This is not a countdown list, going from "tenth best" to "best". As far as we are concerned, all films presented are equally deserving of their placement.
The titles are linked to the reviews, in case you wanna know what we wrote about the given movie.


 
AKA The Dead Eyes of London. What can we say: we love vintage (German) Edgar Wallace movies. The first German Wallace to be directed by Alfred Vohrer, who went on to direct another 13, the movie is an admirable Wallace debut for the director and stars Joachim Fuchsberger as Inspector Larry Holt.
German Trailer:



Film Noir
(Serbia, 2007)
A B&W (plus flashes of color) animated crime flick that occasionally verges on persiflage but that manages to combine a large number of film noir stereotypes and narrative archetypes into an intriguing and entertaining movie. Plus points for being animated.
Trailer:



Zero 2
(Lithuania, 2010)
A sequel, but we never saw the first movie. Zero 2 is a tasteless wanna-be Tarrantino flick from Lithuania that will probably disgust most females, but most guys will find it entertaining. Nothing politically correct or socially redeeming to be found here, but for that a lot of tasteless jokes, good camera work, action, and fun.
(Canada, 1988)
Trash. Pure trash. Unmitigated trash. From the day and age when everyone wanted to make the next Mad Max (1979 / trailer) movie. We loved it — if you love crappy films, you will too. The again, maybe not... But if you do like this piece of celluloid dross, you'll also like two other movies further down on this list.
Full move:

Aka The Inn on the River. One of the best of the B&W German Edgar Wallace movies, once again staring Joachim Fuchsberger, and with an interesting turn by everyone's favorite child molester, Klaus Kinski. As we say in our review, "The third Wallace film adaptation to be directed by director Alfred Vohrer for Rialto Films, Das Gasthaus an der Themse may have its flaws but it is not without reason that it is one of the more popular films of the series: it is both a worthy and enjoyable entry in the series — tacky, thrilling, funny, well-shot, fun."
Trailer:



Frozen Scream
(USA, 1975)
If you like films like Empire of Ash (1988) above, this baby is for you — only this one is even weirder, almost Dali-esque in its surreal lack of skill. As we say in our review: "Frozen Scream is one of those movies that is so bad, so incompetent, so unbelievably what-the-fuck that it makes most Ed Wood films look professional in comparison. One is tempted to simply write it off as 'what-were-they-thinking, oh-they-needed-a-tax-deduction' trash, but, in truth, although an unbelievably inept film, Frozen Scream displays an earnestness shared by all those involved that, regardless of the respective lack of talent, makes the viewer realize that the people involved in the project were probably truly serious about it."
Trailer:



El Dia De La Bestia
(Spain, 1995)
Aka The Day of the Beast. Another fun film from the sorely underrated director of Accion Mutante (1993) and countless other fun films. Álex de la Iglesia is out to shock and make you laugh, and he does both. Not for people who get upset when they see the uncircumcised chorizo of an old, potbellied naked man... and though set at Christmas, it probably isn't really a film you want to see with the family.
Trailer:



Romasanta
(Spain, 2004)

We here at A Wasted Life are not Julian Sands fans. In fact, his presence is usually enough for us to not bother with the movie. We are glad we made an exception for the wonderful, opulent slice of contemporary Eurotrash. If you're a fan of the gothic Italo horrors of the 60s, as are we, this movie is for you: Romasanta is a well made a return to the days of yesteryear that satisfies both one's nostalgia and one's desire for a decent film. Not flawless, but well worth watching.
Trailer:



House of Ghosts / Pisaj
(Thailand, 2004)
 
From our review: "The movie, which seems to be the directorial and screenplay début of Chookiat Sakveerakul is both atmospheric and at times effective, but in the end it is more interesting for its setting in and reflection of contemporary Thai working class culture than it is as a solid slice of horror. But face it, sometimes it's simply fun to watch a film, no matter how flawed, in which the prelude to a scary scene is the directive 'Clean up my Buddha room' and not 'Take this up to the attic / down to the basement'."
Trailer:



(USA, 1999)
 
Originally we planned to make #10 a tie between two negligible films that we found equally if mildly entertaining, if for different reasons: Soft Target / Crooked (USA, 2006) and Return to Horror High (USA, 1987) — but in all truth, while entertaining, neither movie is truly exceptional: Soft Target is too generic, and Return to Horror High simply fails at its WTF end. But luckily, 2015 ended with us once again catching a film so truly terrible, so truly eye-popping fucked up and without any discernible value, that the two mildly enjoyable crapfests got blown away much like a hot air balloon behind King Kong's butt after month of him eating beans. Camp Blood is truly an amazing piece of shit, and a fun one at that. It took us hours to get our jaw back up off the floor. Recommended, like Frozen Scream (USA, 1975) and Empire of Ash (Canada, 1988) above, only to those who like this type of torture. You know who you are.

Beyond Hypothermia / Sip si 32 dou (Hong Kong, 1996)

$
0
0


(Spoilers.) A lean, mean, moving, and unjustly forgotten movie from the tail end of the Golden Age of Hong Kong bullet ballets, Beyond Hypothermia is well worth searching out. What makes this move particularly noteworthy, aside from the competent direction by former John Woo assistant director Patrick Leung, the top-notch editing, and the tight story, is that it manages to merge both what one expects from a multi-violent, blood-drenched Hong Kong killer flick with a surprisingly non-maudlin but touching love story. That it should end tragically is, of course, expected, but that the movie as a whole should be so effective, so successful, is not.
Opening with a bruised and bloody hand reaching for a bullet, the scene initially seems to have nothing with the narrative that follows, but by the end of the movie the circle closes and everything suddenly makes sense — tragic sense. There is no hope, there is no love, and there is no future for killers; and whether driven by a desire of vengeance or by not knowing anything else in life, the final result is the same: you not only kill your darlings, but die yourself.
The plot concerns a nameless hitwoman (the beautiful Jacklyn Wu), raised without a past by her "aunt" as a soulless killer whose cold actions are mirrored by her unnaturally low body temperature. She is less a human than an empty shell and a killing machine, but buried beneath the skin of the literally cold-blooded professional, the longing and desire for love and human companionship struggle to become free. A lonely woman lacking both a past and a future and in need of male companionship, she is slowly warmed by the delicious noodle soup made by the slightly thick-headed, friendly, and equally lonely man (Sean Lau, of Return to a Better Tomorrow[1994 / kill count] andBlack Mask [1996 / trailer]) running the noodle stand across from where she lives. He dubs her "Pretty Ghost" due to her beauty and the way she appears and disappears without warning, and slowly an affectionate relationship develops between them. But the successful completion of a hit in Korea causes that now-dead man's bodyguard (Sang Woo Han) to go off the deep end. He leaves a long, bloody trail of (intentionally and unintentionally) dead bodies as he slowly hones in on the mysterious woman who killed his boss, losing more than just the little humanity he had in the process. In that sense, he is the reverse of "Pretty Ghost": as she warms and thaws out, becoming ever-more human, he becomes ever-more bloodthirsty and cold, soulless, and irredeemable — something he realizes himself in the final scene.

In all truth, were the two core narrative threads of Beyond Hypothermia— a relatively kitschy love story and a blood-drenched shoot-'em-up flick — separated, neither would be all that impressive despite all the stylistic panache and flash of the presentation. What makes Beyond Hypothermia so special is that it manages to follow the templates of the two genres so closely while achieving a balance that both works without seeming trite and that also gets the viewer solidly involved with the narrative and characters, to the point of even caring for the figures (or at least the two lonely leads).

The technical finesse of Leung's camerawork and staging matches well with the don't-waste-time screenplay by Roy Szeto (whose other projects include, among others, The fun kung fu zombie political parable We're Going to Eat You [1980 / trailer],the dead-horse-flogging A Chinese Ghost Story III  [1991 / trailer], the disappointing The Assassin[1993], the intriguing The Phantom Lover [1995 / trailer] and the trashily fun Mutant City[1992 / trailer]). What truly carries the movie, however, and what truly helps make Beyond Hypothermia transcend being simply another flashy, well-made Hong Kong spectacle of flying dead bodies, are the two leads.

Both Wu and Lau are amazing in their respective extremely sketchy roles and manage to make their characters both more rounded and sympathetic than the extremely linear and low-fat script should allow. Wu manages to go from a convincingly heartless professional killer to a woman in doubt to a woman suddenly feeling moments of joy (probably for the first time in her life) with her facial expressions and body language alone, and as a result she makes a killer (so cold-blooded that she barely pauses when killing a child) likeable and an object of the viewer's interest and affection. Lau does likewise, presenting himself as a not-too-bright but extremely engaging man whose heart and love goes out to a mysterious woman, and who does everything possible to catch her interest. By the end of the movie, the viewer really wishes that the two would, could, somehow, ride off into the sunset. Instead, we get a massive shootout, an almost nihilistic last line (from Lau) that literally hurts in its irony, and a sad finale that even leaves even a room full of beer-swilling dudes silent.

True, some aspects (like how weapons are delivered to the heroine) occasionally instigate giggles in their inanity, but one is given little time to mull over such things; they are, in the end, perfunctory aspects that must be resolved quickly to get to the given point of the scene: that the killer is a perfect killer, that she is totally heartless, that the nemeses is introduced. And speaking of the nemeses, Sang Woo Han is a bit one-note in his characterization of the out-of-control, revenge-driven bodyguard, but luckily neither his haircut nor his beady-eyed, blinkless stare do all that much damage to the movie. The biggest flaw of Beyond Hypothermia is without a doubt the dated synth music that swells up in full-blooded 80s/early-90s tastelessness whenever there is a tragic or emotional scene. It is a further credit to the film and the filmmakers that despite be saddled with such a crappy and cheap-sounding aural nightmare, Beyond Hypothermia remains so effective, so tragic, so stunning.

It is time that this forgotten move was rediscovered. Give it a go: it might be the first Hong Kong bullet ballet that your women's-film-loving other half might like.

R.I.P.: Wesley Earl "Wes" Craven, Part V (2000-05)

$
0
0

2 August 1939 – 30 August 2015

What follows is a look at some the projects he was involved in — actually and/or presumably. TV series are ignored.

Go here for Part I (1970-77)
Go here for Part II (1978-86)
Go here for Part III (1987-93)
Go here for Part IV (1994-99)



Wes Craven Presents Dracula 2000
(2000, dir. Patrick Lussier)

"I never drink... coffee."

Aka Dracula 2001. Craven needed a new car, so once again he acted as one of a dozen "producers" and then let his name be plastered all over the promotion material as the "presenter" of this movie directed by his regular editor Patrick Lussier. Lussier eventually went on to make the absolutely great 3-D remake of My Bloody Valentine (1981 / trailer), naturally also titled My Bloody Valentine (2009). The DVD to this movie still lies on our "To See" pile, so one day we'll review it... maybe. Starring a not-yet-famous Gerard Butler — "a relatively unknown actor who falls rather short of the seductiveness necessary for a portrayal of the Count, in my book" [Pop Matters] — and featuring Jeri Ryan (she can seven of nine us any time) as one of the wives, though "a critical and commercial disappointment" [Wikipedia], the movie obviously did well enough for Craven to present two more Patrick Lussier-directed, direct-to-DVD sequels, Dracula II: Ascension (2003) and Dracula III: Legacy (2005), neither with Butler.
Wicked Horror, which calls the movie "a flawed but enjoyable update", has the plot: "A band of thieves (Jennifer Esposito of I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998 / trailer), Omar Epps & others) rob the archives of a notorious collector (Christopher Plummer of Cold Creek Manor [2003 / trailer], Nosferatu in Venedig [1988 / trailer], The Clown at Midnight [1999 / trailer], and The Pyx [1973 / trailer]) in Patrick Lussier's Dracula 2000. The deviants believe they are walking away with a fortune in antiquities, cash, gold, diamonds, and the like, but what they have really scored is the dormant corpse of Dracula (Butler). The collector is from the long line of Van Helsing's that have long been protectors of the innocent and mortal enemies of Dracula. The burglars unintentionally reanimate Dracula's corpse and the ruthless vampire unleashes hell on New Orleans, whilst looking for a young woman (Justine Waddell of Thr3e [2006 / trailer] and The Fall [2006 / trailer]) who shares his bloodline. [...] There are some really witty one-liners, a few great kill scenes, and some interesting twists."
In general, however, the reaction to the movie was more along the lines of Puffy the Cucumber, who froths "In 2000, Dracula comes to New Orleans seeking the daughter of Van Helsing. Bland action movie ensues. Only redeeming factor is that every chick is groin-achingly hot."
Trailer:

 
 
Scream 3
(2000, dir. Wes Craven)
Two years after Scream 2, Scream 3 hit the screens. So where is Kevin Williamson? Doesn't matter, they got some other guy named Ehren Kruger to do the script which, due the social pressure that arose during the aftermath of the Columbine High School killings, had the gore toned down and the humor amped. Three endings were supposedly shot to ensure no leaks got out before the film's premiere. The final result got mixed reviews and ended up being the lowest grossing Scream movie so far, but it was a hit. We haven't seen it yet, but plan to: it features Carrie Fisher and Lance Henriksen, after all.
Trailer:
TV Guide, which says "it all feels a bit tired", has the plot: "Poor Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), survivor of the first two movies, is hiding out in a fortified house in the woods, hoping that if she lays low enough, no psychos will bother her. It's giving away nothing to say her hopes are quickly dashed. Stab 3, the ongoing movie franchise based on Sidney's ordeal, is in production at Sunshine Pictures, with veteran horrormeister John Milton (Henriksen) producing eager beaver Roman Bridger's (Scott Foley) feature-film debut. But someone's using a big sharp knife to fillet the cast and crew, which gets all the familiar faces — reporter Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox Arquette), Deputy Dewey Riley (David Arquette), and, of course, Sidney — back into play. New faces include Detective Kincaid (Patrick Dempsey); Jennifer Jolie (Parker Posey), who's played Gale in all the "Stab" movies; B-movie starlet Sarah Darling (Jenny McCarthy); and spooky ingenue Angelina Tyler (Emily Mortimer), who's playing Sidney in the new movie. The picture is jam-packed with in-jokes and cameos. [...]"
At-A-Glance says: "The concluding episode of Wes Craven's self-aware slasher series suffers by comparison to the first two uncharacteristically clever and genuinely scary episodes in the series. It's as funny as its predecessors (and contains perhaps the single funniest moment in the entire series, involving David Arquette's forehead) but isn't quite as smart or frightening. The only characters worth their salt are the series regulars; the rest are purely Ghostface fodder. Nonetheless, Scream 3 is above par for the genre."
Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds's Red Right Hand,
a song that is heard somewhere in all the first three Scream movies:

Red Right Hand von Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds auf tape.tv.


Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back
(2001, writ. & dir. Kevin Smith)

Since Jay and Bob make a guest appearance in Scream 3, it's only fair Craven shows up the next year in their film (as himself). GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) originally condemned the film for its "overwhelmingly homophobic tone", but changed their tone for a $10,000 donation to the Matthew Shepard Foundation, as well as to include a reference to GLAAD's cause in the ending credits. Plot: Jay and Silent Bob go to Hollywood.
Trailer:
  



They Shoot Divas, Don't They?
(2002, dir. Jonathan Craven)
Opening credits, plus:
Aka Slow Burn. Wes Craven helped produce this TV movie, the directorial debut of his son Jonathan Craven, with whom he co-wrote The Outpost (1995) seven years earlier (see Part IV). They Shoot Divas, Don't They? has some interesting faces in the cast, namely: Jennifer Beals, Tracy Lords, and David Bowie. Imagine All About Eve (1950 / trailer) with a psycho added and moved into a pop music setting: "Sloan McBride (Beals, of Dr. M [1990]) is an 80s music star who is trying to hold on to her career. She hires Jenny (Keri Lynn Pratt) as her assistant and Jenny seems to be the perfect employee. However, Jenny is actually planning her revenge because she blames Sloan for ruining her mother's career and causing her suicide." [Lifetime Movies]
Jennifer Beals —
I Can See through You:



They
(2002, dir. Robert Harmon)
Another flick dealing with killer dreams, and once again, Wes Craven Presents it. But as is explained in the film's FAQ page at imdb, "The complete U.S. title for They is Wes Craven Presents: They. Craven was considered an 'executive producer' of the movie. However, other than lending his name to the title, he had no part in the making of They. It's assumed that the purpose for putting his name in the title was to publicize the movie and attract horror fans." (Duh!) Also over at imdb, Claudio Carvalho of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, provides the plot in occasionally odd English: "While preparing for the examination of her Master Degree in Psychology, Julia Lund (Laura Regan) is called by her friend from childhood Billy Parks (Jon Abrahams) to meet him in a bar. They both had nightmares when they were children, and Billy is totally disturbed with demons from the dark that would be chasing him and commits suicide in front of Julia. The traumatic experience, plus the meeting with two friends of Billy, Sam Burnside (Ethan Embry) and his girlfriend Terry Alba (Dagmara Dominczyk of Lonely Hearts [2006]), in the funeral make Julia having nightmares again. When Sam tells her that they four have been tagged in their childhood, and demons are coming to get them to the darkness, Julia becomes afraid of the dark and asks for help to her boyfriend Paul Loomis (Marc Blucas)."
Trailer:
Dr Gore saw the movie and like many, he was not impressed: "Beware the PG-13 horror movie. It teases and teases but does not deliver. The concept was solid. Night terrors/beasts/things are attacking kids again after taking a break for a couple of years. So where was the payoff? Usually the characters have to go through the usual hoops where no one believes them, they must be crazy etc. This one never lets up and the grown kids are left to fend for themselves. It gets annoying after the third, 'Here, rest awhile, you're just under stress' scene. [...] Another downside is that I couldn't wait for the lead character to die. Couldn't wait. She did not inspire sympathy. Whine, whine, whine. In a nutshell, weak. SCORE: 1 out of 4 scary things happening off screen to characters I don't care about."
Many, many years ago, director Robert Harmon made his first feature movie, a low budget masterpiece entitled The Hitcher (1986), which was poorly remade in 2007 (trailer). It was a promising start to a lackluster career.

 
Wes Craven Presents
Dracula II: The Ascension
(2003, dir. Patrick Lussier)
Patrick Lussier returns to make the first direct-to-video sequel of Wes Craven Presents Dracula 2000, and Craven prostates his name yet again. (Nothing wrong with that, as the fact of the matter is just like what the Pop Group sings below).
The Pop Group —
We are all Prostitutes:
Co-written with Joel Soisson, who also worked on Piranha 3DD (2012), The Ascension was filmed in Romania — in Transylvania, no less, if we are to believe some reports — but the synergy didn't seem to do much, as the open-ended film was not well received. In theory, the events begin mere hours after where the first movie ends. Nevertheless, Gerard Butler does not return as Dracula, replaced instead by Stephen Billington — who, in real life and out that makeup, can bite us anytime — who does return in the next sequel, Dracula III: Legacy (2005), for a few scenes.
Beyond Hollywood, which posits that "you have to really like genre movies to like Ascension", has an intelligent observation regarding the movie that more or less reflects the entire plot development of the film: "About 25 minutes into Dracula 2: Ascension, Fair Hair Lead Elizabeth (Diane Neal of Dirty Movie [2011 / trailer]) moans, 'Why is this happening?' Well, Lizzie, let's recap what you've done in just the last 10 minutes alone, shall we? Let's see: discover a vampire in your morgue; steal the vampire; and then feed the vampire a bathtub full of blood. Gee, no wonder Elizabeth is so shocked that Dracula woke up, killed one of her friends, and tries to kill the rest. Stupid girl."
Beyond Hollywood also has a decent plot synopsis: "Jason Scott Lee (of Ghoulies III: Ghoulies Go to College [1991 / trailer]) stars as Uffizi, a priest and vampire hunter, who has tracked the burning corpse of Dracula (last seen roasting on a cross over Mardi Gras) to a morgue. Before Uffizi can destroy the undead bloodsucker’s remains, enterprising coroner Luke (Jason London of Carrie II: The Rage [1999]) and med student Elizabeth steals the body. Elizabeth's plan is to use Drac's powers to save Lowell (Craig Sheffer of Flying Virus [2001]), the love of her life, but Luke just wants to get rich because a mysterious phone call has offered him $3 million for the body."
Trailer:


Freddy vs. Jason
(2003, dir. Ronny Yu)
A Nightmare on Friday the 13th. Actually, Wes Craven had absolutely nothing to do with this movie other than that he created the character of Freddy Kruger, but seeing that it is the last Kruger movie — and Jason flick, for that matter — before both characters were (badly) rebooted, and that Jason is so closely connected with Sean S. Cunningham, who sort of kicked off Craven's above ground career with the original Last House on the Left (1972, see Part I), and that we found the great movie poster above (from Ghana), we felt like featuring it here. 'Sides, the great Ronny Yu directed, even if F vs. J isn't one of his better films — The Bride of Chucky (1998), for example, seems like a much better movie. (We ourselves have popped Freddy vs. Jason into our DVD player at least three times by now, but have never made it to the end. We've heard, however, Jason won.)
Trailer:
Classic Horror says, "Make no qualms about it, this film has no cinematic merit at all, and the plot (if you could call it that) was a mess." But Dr Gore would beg to disagree, gushing: "Now this is one match-up that I have waited many full moons to see. [...] Freddy vs. Jason makes one thing abundantly clear: These characters are not scary anymore. The monsters have become the heroes. No one fears for the lives of the victims. Every time Jason twisted someone's head off or gave them a taste of his blade, the audience was cheering. We want the monsters to win. [...] So Freddy (Robert Englund) needs Jason (Ken Kirzinger) to come back to life. Jason takes the machete to the new kids on Elm Street's block. The survivors start thinking Freddy is responsible for the hacking and slashing. It's too bad for Freddy that Jason is a glutton and can't stop killing Elm Street kids. Freddy takes it personal. No one messes with his victims. This all leads up to the title bout: FREDDY vs. JASON. Finally! This is where the movie shines. There is plenty of blood and guts and hacking and slashing and, well, everything you wanted to see. The fight at the end is a great payoff scene. I enjoyed the carnage. I don't think you could ask for much more from a movie called Freddy vs. Jason. It delivered the fight everyone wanted to see. Freddy was sufficiently gutted for my tastes."
Trailer to one of Ronny Yu's masterpieces —


Tales from the Crapper
(2004, dir. by six directors)
Depending on where you look, Wes Craven is either one of the many faces that flit by in this Tromapiece, or he "contributed $100 to the production while visiting the set". Maybe he did both. Who knows for sure, and who cares?
TromaWiki explains the movie: "Welcome to Tales from the Crapper, an epic of biblical proportions and questionable taste. Boasting the greatest cast and largest breasts ever assembled in Troma's thirty-year history, Tales from the Crapper will cause you to lock your door, look under your bed and pray for daylight. Tales from the Crapper is the inaugural film in Troma Entertainment and Lloyd von Kaufman's acclaimed Dogpile 95 Doctrine of Digital Filmmaking, and is destined to be part of all the critics's must see lists this year. Filmed on three continents, over a three-year period, with six directors, fifteen writers and a cast of hundreds, Tales from the Crapper adds up to pure en-TROMA-tainment! Hosted by everyone's favorite harbinger of the horrible, The Crapkeeper, Tales from the Crapper boasts not one but TWO films in one extraordinary digital feature! Twice the monsters! Twice the fat guys! And twice the boobies! Tired of searching for the perfect blend of highbrow entertainment, kung-fu action, alien adventure, and hot vampire lesbian sex? Well, look no further, because Tales from the Crapper is the perfect combination of those things!"
The Worldwide Celluloid Massacre, whose opinion we learned not to trust, rates the movie as "Worthless". On the other hand, this is a Troma flick, so they might be right...
Trailer:



Feast
(2005, dir. John Gulager)
The feature-film directorial debut of the wanna-be exploitation director John Gulager, son of the legendary cult actor Clu Gulager (of Return of the Living Dead [1985 / trailer] and a lot more great trash); Gulager Jr has proven himself to be trash-master extraordinary with the direct-to-DVD, socially un-redeeming sequels Feast II: Sloppy Seconds (2008 / trailer) and Feast III: The Happy Finish (2009 / a lot of dead people), not to mention the highly entertaining but almost universally panned Piranha 3DD (2012). His most recent project was the TV zombie gorefest Zombie Night (2013 / trailer) — we see him as a name with a future.
Wes Craven, along with Ben Affleck and Matt Damon, was an executive producer of the movie; O.J. Simpson had a cameo originally but was cut out of the final print.
Plot? Well, Dr Gore has the Shakespearean plot for you: "Feast is about monsters attacking people in a bar. The end. It is a simple, stripped down, gory monster flick. No frills. No fuss. Just blood and guts. The who, what, where and why of the monster's reason for being or attacking is not discussed. When you get down to it, it's not that important. What is important is that monsters are ripping people apart as disgustingly as possible. Feast delivers the monster thrills."
As A (Nutshell) Review mentions, "The story and action starts immediately [...] after a no-frills super summarized introduction to all the players involved with the use of character titles. What will set the tone here, is that the introduction is highly comical, and gets the job done in a no-frills manner, so much so that most of the characters don't have names, but rather are named after caricatures, like Hero for obviously the Hero [Eric Dane], and Honey Pot [Jenny Wade] for a busty blonde chick (a staple in slasher-horror-thrillers)."
Trailer:
A trash masterpiece the fits to beer and pot like red wine to a steak or AIDS to a crack whore. Not one to watch with the little lady at home.

 
Cursed
(2005, dir. Wes Craven)
Cursed was a cursed project from the start, despite the presence of the hit team Kevin Williamson (scriptwriter) and director Craven. Studio interference caused interminable delays and rewrites and reshoots, to the point that the film made was completely different than the one originally approved and with an almost totally different cast. As cast member Judy Greer has often been quoted of saying, "I don't know who kept making them fuck with it. [...] We shot the movie for, like, seven years. I think they said we had four movies worth of footage." Nevertheless, for that the movie is surprisingly coherent.
Trailer:
The Video Graveyard, which didn't like Cursed and called it "the first truly awful horror film of 2005", has the plot: "On their way home in the Hollywood hills siblings Elli (Christina Ricci of The Gathering [2003] and Sleepy Hollow [1999]) and Jimmy (Jesse Eisenberg of Zombieland [2009]) get into a car accident after some sort of animal hits their vehicle. When they go to save the driver of the other car they see her dragged away by some sort of giant creature and end-up being bitten themselves. Soon enough they find out that the creature they saw was, in fact, a werewolf and soon they are beginning to start to transform. People start showing up dead, Eisenberg attempts to win his high school dream girl in the lame sub-plot, and their bodies start to slowly transform. In order to break the curse they need to find the person who attacked them — and the script proceeds to throw-out multiple red herrings until the obvious and predictable finale."
Trailer of a way better movie with Christina Ricci—
Tim Burton's Sleepy Hollow:
We did see Cursed: once again, Craven's casting and that alone brought us to his movie film. (Christina Ricci is the bee's knees, the cat's meow and our wet dream rolled in one.) We found the movie way better than all the troubled production and bad press had led us to expect — and it is a thousand times better than the next werewolf movie we saw, the bloated and misfired big budget Wolfman (2010 / trailer). Our basic opinion jives with that of Dr Gore, who says, "As a horror flick, Cursed is pretty weak. The werewolf scenes are campy. When a wild, evil, snarling werewolf stops to give people the finger, you know this beast is just not wild enough. Werewolf attacks obnoxious Hollywood teens and no one cares. There's nothing scary going on here. Even after saying all that, I still kind of enjoyed Cursed for what it was. Being a desperate werewolf fan, I was just happy to see the big guy back on the big screen. I'm easy to please." In any event, one day we here at A Wasted Life might bother to watch the R-rated version, but doing so isn't high on our list — too much "been there done that" for only two minutes of footage.


Red Eye
(2005, dir. Wes Craven)
Another one of Craven's rare forays away from straight horror and, as normal, he handles himself well enough that one does wonder why he wasn't given more non-horror projects. Red Eye, a thriller, is a B-film in its heart, but it has its heart in the right place. Unpretentious, well-made and well-acted, its narrative is far more enjoyable if you check your brain in at the door, and if you don't start pulling at the seams you are in for a tight and thrilling ride — at least until the final scene, when Red Eye changes from a suspenseful "trapped in a life-threatening situation" to a "killer in the house" movie.
Unlike Cursed, released the same year, Red Eye was a critical and financial success. We also enjoyed it, but would tend to label it a movie you watch with the better half, and not one to watch with the guys.
Qwipster has the plot: "Rachel McAdams stars as hotel manager Lisa Reisert, who is delayed at the airport due to the terrible local weather in Texas. While waiting for her flight, she meets a handsome and charismatic man named Jackson Rippner (Cillian Murphy of 28 Day Later [2003 / trailer]), and together they share some interesting conversation while they wait for the next available flight to Miami. Finally, they are booked on the 'red-eye', the last flight of the night, and as fate would have it, they end up seated together. Small talk grows more sinister as Jack reveals that he isn't all he seems to be, as he intends to use Lisa's clout as the hotel manager in order to secure a room change that would lead to the possible assassination of one of the country's top officials."
Trailer:



Wes Craven Presents
Dracula III: Legacy
(2005, dir. Patrick Lussier)

Director Lussier and co-scriptwriter Joel Soisson return for yet another direct-to-video flick "presented" by Wes Craven, whose only involvement in the flick was probably cashing the check he got for gracing it with his name. More than one source claims that Part II and III were shot at the same time, and seeing that they share the same cast and location, it seems believable that they were. Oddly enough, however, the Dracula of the first sequel (Stephen Billington) is now Rutger Hauer — normally a better actor, in any event, though as Foster on Film points out, "Hauer is hardly in the film, popping in only in the last few minutes to ham it up. If his part required more than a day of shooting, they weren't trying."
Most people who have bothered to watch both movies share the opinion that Dracula III: Legacy, like Dracula II: The Ascension, can pretty much be viewed as a solo movie as knowledge of the prior film(s) is not absolutely necessary, but Cinema on the Rocks disagrees, bitching that "Dracula III: Legacy isn't worthwhile unless one has already watched Dracula II and for some reason feels obligated to see how it ends."
Trailer:
Arrow in the Head seems to have liked the flick a little more: "On the heels of the Dracula 2: Ascension cliffhanger, witty Luke (London) and half-vamp, half-priest, all-asswhopper Ufizzi (Lee), travel through a vampire-ravaged Romania with the intent of saving Luke's chickadee Julia (Wescourt) and finding Dracula's (Hauer) pad to bury his fanged derriere once and for all. Get the whip, the blades, a six-pack and the stakes... it's vamp exterminating time… Ufizzi style! [...] We get one fully naked chick and then we get more naked broads in a scene that I like to call the 'Orgy of Blood'. I wouldn't mind attending one of those, like… SOON! The ladies get Jason Scott Lee shirtless and toned like a mofo on a mofo workout regime! [...] Let the gravy hit the meat! We get severed heads, harpoons in the chest/head/ eye (nice one!), mangled corpses, some impalings, stakings, a melting head, a lopped off arm, a body cut in two, some vamp bites, and more!"
Dr Gore was also caught by the orgy scene — "I guess Dracula's ladies would rather suck each other's blood than have to actually go out and get some themselves"— but hated the movie, saying "[...] Dracula III is so relentlessly stupid and edited so badly that I started to lose interest in it by the fifteen minute mark. [...] It's a collection of random vampire scenes that were stapled together to give the illusion of a coherent movie. Unless you desperately need to see vampires getting wasted, it can be skipped." 


Inside Deep Throat
(2005, dir. Fenton Bailey & Randy Barbato)
Yes, we've seen the original — and for all the body hair and bad acting and unattractive flesh, we liked it: Deep Throat is pretty funny. The boner or wet panties you [might] get is just an added attraction. The documentary on the social impact of the movie is available in two versions, an R-Rated Version and an NC-17 Version, but really, if the two-odd minutes that got the film an NC-17 chill you or bother you, what are you doing here at A Wasted Life?
Trailer:
Among the many talking heads, you find Wes Craven who, while mentioning a few of the early porn projects with which he learned the ropes of film and direction (see Part I), plays coy and refuses to offer a full list of past projects. (You can rest assured, that the list in Part I is but the tip of the iceberg — an iceberg we would love to surmount one day.) In any event, we took a brief look at Deep Throat (1972) in R.I.P.: Harry Reems Part II.
Soundtrack to the original
Deep Throat (1972):
Deep Throat, among other things, is famous for being one of the most profitable movies ever made (roughly $600 million on $25,000 production costs). Most people overlook the obvious, though Roger Ebert (R.I.P.) — who gave the documentary three stars — did not: "Deep Throat was made on the far fringes of the movie industry [...]. Since the mob owned most of the porn theaters in the pre-video days and inflated box office receipts as a way of laundering income from drugs and prostitution, it is likely, in fact, that Deep Throat did not really gross $600 million, although that might have been the box office tally.
El Gore cuts to the meat and potatoes of the documentary: "In Inside Deep Throat, Fenton Bailey and Randy Barbato examine the reasons behind the film's success and its tremendous impact on American society with the help of some members of the cast and crew (including Gerard Damiano and stock footage of Linda Lovelace herself) and other interviewees like John Waters, Larry Flynt, Ruth Westheimer, and Hugh Hefner. It focuses on the controversy and witch hunt surrounding the pop culture phenomenon that was banned in 23 states and nearly got Lovelace's co-star Harry Reems arrested for five years on obscenity charges, and aims to illuminate both sides of the coin."
TV Guide, unbelievably enough, has one of the better descriptions of this documentary on "the taboo-busting, precedent-setting" movie: "[...] A gold mine of giddy highs, stygian lows, and colorful dramatis personae. Clown-prince of porn Harry Reems, who naively imagined the movie's notoriety would help jump-start a mainstream acting career, spent years battling legal prosecution (though persecution is really the more appropriate term) and sank into a deep, alcohol-fueled depression before remaking himself as a small-town realtor. Lovelace, who later claimed she was forced by then-boyfriend Chuck Traynor to appear in the film that made her famous, drifted into unhappy obscurity haunted by her liberated alter ego and died, broke, in a 2002 car accident. Hairdresser-turned-smutmeister Gerard Damiano, cut out of the profits by his Mafia-connected backers. Henpecked Florida theater owner Arthur Sommer and his shrewish wife. Moral crusader Larry Parrish, who tried to lock up Reems and throw away the key for the crime of being in a blue movie and, years later wishes terrorists would go away so America's watchdogs could return to combating 'prostitutes and whoremongers'… you couldn't make these people up. But Fenton and Barbato also place Deep Throat firmly in the context of a turbulent time, when making a sex movie was an act of rebellion (however Quixotic), rather than a mercenary grab for the goodies. Descended from a long line of smokers, stag loops and white-coaters, Deep Throat— by any objective standard a lead-footed comedy with artless hardcore scenes — was the thin edge of the wedge. Much watched, more discussed and indisputable proof that there was more money in the adult film business than anyone ever dreamed, it appeared as the legacy of 1960s counterculture turmoil was wreaking unprecedented change on American attitudes towards women, free speech and sex. It triggered court cases, tempted dirty-movie virgins into porno theaters, added a fresh term to the lexicon of dirty talk, and brought both sexually explicit movies and the debate over their place in a free society into the spotlight. All but unwatchable in light of today's slickly produced smut, Deep Throat ran a carnally candid banner up the flagpole and America saluted."
A Wasted Life would disagree with the last sentence, and say that particularly due to "today's slickly produced smut", Deep Throat is eminently watchable. It's just badly acted and has body hair and pimples.

Part VI will follow next month

Incubus (USA 2006)

$
0
0

(Spoilers — but, like, who fucking cares?) Written by Gary Humphreys, who also wrote True True Lie (trailer), another unknown movie likewise filmed that same year in Romania, which, going by a landscape pan near the start of the movie, looks like it might be a beautiful country worth going to. Incubus, however, is not a movie in any way worth watching.
AKA Fear Factory, the original title of Incubus gives hope to some form of sex horror movie, as the literal translation of "incubus"— a male version of a "succubus"— is an evil spirit that descends upon women as they sleep for sexual intercourse. But the film jettisons the fine points of the term and, instead, claims that an incubus is simply some demon that invades your dreams. Wrong — like everything else about this direct-to-digital flick.*
*This movie's minor claim to fame is that it is the first movie ever released specifically as a direct-to-download movie: it premiered on the Internet and was released by AOL on Halloween, 2006. There is a lot of crap on the Internet. 
In all truth, a more fitting title of this "movie" would be A Total Piece of Shit, and that is what we will call it as of now. A cut and dry template for a career-killing movie that doesn't even succeed at being funny bad, A Total Piece of Shit excels only in the amount of boredom it induces. And while it is easy to understand why non-actors with no career might accept a part in a flick like this, it is sad to think that anyone who ever had any career at all, even a minor one like that of Tara Reid, would stoop so low. (To fall any deeper would require a co-starring role with Richard Grieco — see: Webs [2003] and Raiders of the Damned [2005].)
The plot of A Total Piece of Shit is a predictable as the movie itself, and is driven primarily by one laugh-inducing, head-shaking, unbelievable, and bad decision after the other on part of the youthful fodder-cum-wannabe characters. Five minutes into the movie, after a badly lit and shot chase and kill scene in some locked-up compound, these six stock characters are introduced and it quickly becomes obvious that they are not only bound to die and that they probably subconsciously want to die, but that they are all bona-fide candidates for the Darwin Awards: every decision made in the movie, like most of the dialogue, is not only illogical, but screams "Kill me!" Indeed, we have seldom seen a movie in which the characters all deserved to die more than they do in A Total Piece of Shit.
Our six idiots — semi-Final Girl Jay (Tara Reid), her brother Josh (Russell Carter), and friends Peter (Christian Brassington) and Karen (Monica Barladeanu of Caved In [2006 / trailer] and Fall Down Dead [2007 / trailer]) and Holly (Alice O'Connell) and token Afro-American Bug (Akemnji Ndifernyan) — survive a nasty car accident (unscratched!) while returning home from a camping trip in the mountains of Montana, a camping trip that obviously involved no camping equipment but does involve Karen wearing "five-hundred-dollar boots". Of course, they do the logical thing of wandering off the road and across the countryside and, since they're going to freeze if they stay outside, breaking into the first fenced-in and locked-up building they happen to stumble upon — by rappelling (!!!) 30 meters down through an opening on the roof. (Here Karen, who early on shows herself to be the stupid bitch, proves to be the smartest one there by turning around and leaving. By dint of the film's closing scene, she actually turns out to be the movie's true Final Girl.) Trapped in the compound, they stumble upon the so-called incubus, a sleeping murderer (Mihai Stanescu of Catacombs [2007 / trailer]) instantly recognized by Jay. ("It's the guy who bit off his tongue...") Only, instead of being put to death as reported to the press, the bad boy had been handed over to bad people conducting bad experiments. As can be guessed, once the non-teen teen idiots enter the compound, the rest of A Total Piece of Shit is basically about them running around a lot and making more stupid decisions, all of which lead to them dying one by one.
In any event, any person with a brain — and probably even those without one — won't find anything mildly of interest in A Total Piece of Shit, which drags on for way too long and does nothing but stumble from one annoying stupidity to the other, torturing all viewers (or at least those that don't save themselves by falling asleep or turning the movie off) with interminable, noxious boredom. We can only guess A Total Piece of Shit was made as a tax deduction and not as a serious project, for no one making a serious movie (unless truly untalented) would make a movie like this, a movie so moribund and lethargic and unintelligent and uncreative that its overriding and all-encompassing inability and carelessness doesn't even manage to garner giggles. (How carelessly was the movie made? Well, one character kills his possessed girlfriend and doesn't even blink. They use flashlights even when the lights are on and complain that the batteries are getting low. And — perhaps the most subtle of all the mistakes — characters who have bitten off their tongue talk totally normal moments later.)
Nothing exciting happens, nothing scary happens, nothing is well-shot or well-acted, nothing is in any way interesting or involving or worth wasting your time on in A Total Piece of Shit. We saw A Total Piece of Shit so you don't have to.

Short Film: The Hobbit (USA / Czechoslovakia, 1966)

$
0
0
As of yet, all Short Films of the Month presented here at A Wasted Life were presented because we found them good. Here, however, is one presented because we think it sucks. And sucks enough to be interesting, sort of.
Did you, like us, see Peter Jackson's overly long and drawn out and oddly uninvolving trilogy and think, "Well, it can't get worse than this"? (OK, in all truth, we only saw the first two instalments; we decided not to bother with the third one.) Thing is, it was already worse twice before: in NBC's "execrable" kiddy animated kiddy musical version from 1977, and in this formerly presumed lost animated short film from 1966.
Wikipedia explains the facts: "The 1966 short animated film The Hobbit! was the first ever film production of The Hobbit. It was directed by Gene Deitch in Czechoslovakia. American film producer William L. Snyder [14 Feb 1918 – 3 June 1998] obtained the rights to the novel from the Tolkien estate very cheaply while it was still largely unknown, with the proviso that he produce a 'full-colour film' by 30 June 1966, and immediately set about producing a feature-length film, with screenplay by Deitch. The project fell through, but after the explosion in the novel's popularity, Snyder realized that his contract had not required the film to be of any length: he therefore instructed Deitch to create a 12-minute film based on his earlier work so that he could retain his rights. He later sold the rights for around $100,000 (not adjusted for inflation). The final project has very little to do with the source material." According to imdb, "The film was screened once in a Manhattan theater on June 30, 1966, the day the contract expired."
Not everyone hates the short. Eye for Film, which says "it's still a treat for completists and an enjoyable little film in its own right", has the following praise: "Brought to life by the beautiful illustrations of Czech painter Adolf Born, which will strike a chord with anyone who grew up watching kids' TV in Europe in the Seventies, this is a whimsical tale that will continue to charm younger viewers today. Excitement is provided by the swelling orchestral music of Václav Lidl, and Herb Lass' narration delivers on drama whilst maintaining a reassuring, bedtime story tone. Although there's no animation in the conventional sense, flashing lights lend impact to the scary sequences and there's so much detail to enjoy that the eye never wanders."
Decide for yourself.

The Curse of Frankenstein (Great Britain, 1957)

$
0
0

(Spoilers!) The film that made Hammer… and both Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee's careers, though in the case of the latter, he really didn't gain all that much international attention until the following year in Hammer's Horror of Dracula (1958 / trailer).
Directed by Terrence Fisher, written by Jimmy Sangster, this version of Mary Shelley's classic shocker is a far cry from James Whale's classic black and white version, but the 1957 film is only all the better for it. Threatened with legal action by Universal Studios should the film be too similar to their version, not only was the original monster's iconic look given a wide berth, but scriptwriter Jimmy Sangster returned to and updated the original source (even as he kept the novel's time period), dumping all the poetry of Whale's 1931 version and doubling the blood, sex, and cynicism. Like the novel upon which it is based, The Curse of Frankenstein is very much about the good doctor himself, the monster making his appearance relatively late in the movie and, in general, remaining very much a secondary figure.
Featuring excellent production values, top-notch acting, and more blood and carnality than the public of the time was used to seeing in their horror films, the movie was met by scathing critiques but nonetheless quickly became the most profitable film made by an English studio, a position it held for many years. (It also jump-started the mania for Gothic horror films that Hammer was to excel in.) The movie's present position as a horror classic has come to it like flavor does to vintage wine, slowly and only over the passage of time. The first Frankenstein film to be made in color, it was Hammer's first color production as well, which very much indicates that despite all the admonishments to the contrary, both the film company and director Fisher were out to create something extraordinary from the very beginning. (Likewise, unlike with any of their earlier productions, Hammer cut a deal with Warner's for the U.S. distribution of the movie in advance of the actual filming.)
Not that all those involved necessarily believed the film would amount to much. An oft-told tale about The Curse of Frankenstein that might or might not be true involves an exchange between Cushing and Lee when the actual filming began: When Lee complained that his character had no lines, Cushing supposedly retorted, "You are lucky — I've read the script." Whatever his feelings may have originally been about the project, Cushing nevertheless supplied one of the best acting jobs of his long and illustrious career, presenting a truly definitive version of the doctor as a cold-hearted, dedicated egoist, ruthlessly driven by a desire to master science, forever blind to anything minutely resembling morals or guilt. Charming he may be, but behind that mask of English refinement hides an arrogant, psychotic soul.
If Cushing's acting turn is top notch, that of the other stars of the film is variable. As Paul Krempe, Frankenstein's tutor and later assistant, Robert Urquhart makes no special impression other than that he is obviously younger than the adult Frankenstein despite supposedly being many years older. The film's mouthpiece of morals, he tends to annoy and seems highly ineffectual all the way up until the final scene in which he seals the doctor's doom by denying that the creature ever existed, an act which actually is contrary to the moralistic stance of his character up to that point, for it can be seen as nothing less than an act of simple deviousness: by insuring Frankenstein's execution, he finally gets the girl. The girl in this case is Elizabeth, played by Hazel Court, one of the most beautiful scream queens of the time. A capable actress, she does much with what is little less than a peripheral, token role, making a much more indelible appearance than Urquhart, despite his meatier part. (Her eventual retirement from horror movies after her marriage to US television director Don Taylor came much too early, depriving the genre of one of the best scream queens after Barbara Steele.)
As for Lee, despite having almost less screen time than Court, he makes an excellent impression as the monster, presenting him as an uncoordinated killing machine, a creature alien to both its stitched-together shell and the world around it. That he kills has nothing to do with him being "evil", but rather to the fact that he doesn't seem to know that he can do anything else. As for the other tertiary characters, only the maid Justine (Valerie Gaunt) makes any true impression, due as much to her campy accent and her position as the creature's only female victim (in her nightgown, no less) as to the fact that she manages to exude enough earthy sexuality to make it easy to believe that Frankenstein would be more than willing to bonk her. (Oddly enough, her career seemingly never went any further than this film and a brief appearance as one of the Count's vampire consorts in Horror of Dracula.)
The Curse of Frankenstein opens with the young, orphaned Baron (Melvyn Hayes) primly dong his prescribed duties in regard to the burial of his deceased mother. That out of the way, he promptly hires Paul Krempe (Urquhart) as his tutor. Jump start ahead, the Baron is not only (as mentioned before) an adult suddenly much older than his tutor, but he is the owner of a full-blown mad-scientists lab in which he and his tutor-turned-assistant carry out all sorts of experiments in the name of science. Starting with the revival of a dead dog, they quickly move on to stitching together a humanoid creature from body parts collected and stolen (some, like the hands, under the most questionable of circumstances). Elizabeth (Court) shows up to take her promised matrimonial place at the side of the Baron just around the time when the moralistic Krempe opts out of further assisting the Baron to instead hang around making declarations of future doom. The Baron kills for a brain which in turn Krempe damages, but there is no stopping the driven, ruthless mad scientist. The Creature (Lee) is a pathetic mess, an out-of-whack piece of reanimated body parts that does little more than kill and destroy; despite its obvious faults, the Baron revives it a second time after its initial death. Finally, after it is destroyed in that handy vat of acid every turn of the century scientist seems to have had in his lab, the Baron is held responsible for the creature's murders and must face the hangman alone, deserted by both Krempe and Elizabeth… Of course, as everyone knows who has seen the less-visceral and almost as equally entertaining sequel, the Baron does not lose his head as planned.
It must be added that the film's greatness lies more in the whole of the parts than in the direction itself. Despite his lasting fame and the respected reputation, Terence Fisher was somewhat staid when it came to using the camera. His compositions are definitely balanced, but his direction tends towards immobility. Fisher's true talent seems to have been to get the best out of the people he worked with, be it the actors or the set designer, and that is what makes the movie here. Indeed, in The Curse of Frankenstein, his camera work is so static that when he finally uses his famous speeded-up zoom to the freshly revealed face of the monster, the trick is so obvious that it almost fails: one is less shocked by the monster's ravaged appearance than by the sudden, unexpected movement of the camera. Luckily, however, all the other ingredients of the movie mix so well that the finale result remains an undisputed, if minutely flawed, masterpiece of horror.

R.I.P.: Wesley Earl "Wes" Craven, Part VI (2006-16) + Addendum (1976)

$
0
0

2 August 1939 - 30 August 2015

What follows is a look at some the projects he was involved in — actually and/or presumably. TV series are ignored.

Go here for Part I (1970-77)
Go here for Part II (1978-86)
Go here for Part III (1987-93)
Go here for Part IV (1994-99)
Go here for Part V (2000-05)



The Hills Have Eyes
(2006, dir. Alexandre Aja)

That it took Wes Craven so long to see the financial possibilities of having his older movies remade is almost inexplicably odd, considering the success of all the remakes of not-so-old movies prior to Aja's version of The Hills Have Eyes, ranging from crappy (e.g., Willard [2003] and Village of the Damned [1995] — but were either financially successful?) to fun but dumb (e.g., Thirteen Ghosts [2001 / trailer] and House of Haunted Hill [1999 / trailer]) to entertainingly effective (e.g., Night of the Living Dead [1990 / trailer] and The Blob [1988]) to excellent (e.g., Dawn of the Dead [2004 / trailer] and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre [2003 / trailer]). But one day Wes Craven saw the light, and after watching Alexandre Aja's well-made but extremely questionable French horror movie Haute Tension (2003 / trailer) — which we saw and would've liked had it not been so lesbophobic — he pulled in Aja and his pal Grégory Levasseur to take over the remake of The Hills Have Eyes. And, damn! If they didn't manage to make a movie that is, in many ways, more effective and multi-layered (and gory and violent) than the original from 1977. Wow. (OK, we totally ignore the narrative fuck-up of the film: the bad guys don't kill the good guy before they put him in the fridge.)
Filmed in Morocco (but set in New Mexico), the cannibalistic family is now a mass of hungry mutants and far more dirty and scary, while the survivors are also far more delineated as characters and some actually grow during the course of the movie — particularly Doug Bukowski (Aaron Stanford), who believably goes from a wimpy nerd to a survivor willing to kill.
Trailer to
The Hills Have Eyes: 
Eat My Brains has the plot: "The extended Carter family are on their way to California but Big Bob Carter (Ted Levine of The Mangler [1995 / trailer]) is hell bent on taking the 'scenic route' through the desert. They run into a spot of trouble when their car falls victim to spikes in the road, laid there by the victims of US government nuclear testing — human mutants from an isolated mining community who refused to leave their homes when the government took over the area for research. The inhabitants of the area are now deformed versions of their former selves, preying on unfortunate passers-by who have taken wrong directions from the clan's only human link to the outside world, a gas station owner (Tom Bower of The Killing Jar [1997 / trailer] and Lady in White [1988 / trailer]). He leads the raw meat their direction and in return, receives valuable belongings of dead hill victims. The dysfunctional family unit react in their own individual ways to their attackers. Three in particular are forced to rely on their primal survival instincts if they are going to outfight and outwit the wrath of the mutants. [...]"
More and More by Webb Pierce —
The song played over the opening credits:




Pulse
(2006, dir. Jim Sonzero)
Wes Craven and Ray Wright (who went on to help write the unsatisfying Case 39 [2009 / trailer] and the satisfying remake of The Crazies [2010 / trailer]) supplied the screenplay to the American remake of the 2001 Nippon horror flick of the same name by the productive director Kiyoshi Kurosawa. Rumor has it Craven was set to direct but bailed somewhere along the line. A critical bomb, it nevertheless proved successful enough to "warrant" two direct-to-DVD sequels — are direct-to-DVD sequels ever truly warranted? — shot in tandem by Joel Soisson entitled Pulse 2: Afterlife (2008) and Pulse 3 (2008).
Trailer to
Pulse:
Foster on Film has a bare-boned plot description: "Mattie (Kristen Bell of Reefer Madness [2005 / trailer]) finds her boyfriend, Josh (Jonathan Tucker of Michael Bay's Texas Chainsaw Massacre [2003 / trailer]), hanging from a telephone cable.  Soon other friends and strangers are committing suicide or disappearing and ghostly images are popping up on the internet.  Teaming up with Dexter (Ian Somerhalder), who purchased Josh's computer, Mattie tries to discover what is happening and if the code that Josh was working on can stop it."
Combustible Celluloid, like most, didn't like the remake: "Kiyoshi Kurosawa's Kairo (a.k.a. Pulse) may have been the scariest movie of the past 10 years, but the new American remake is a soulless imitation, set in a ruddy blue-gray world with grimy bathrooms and poorly-lit libraries. Kurosawa's concept, having to do with loneliness and isolation due to technology, is now distilled into a plot in which evil ghosts use the Internet and cell phones to attack the living. Kurosawa used chilling, dreamlike imagery, but director Jim Sonzero substitutes loud noises and sudden, jerky movements to pull off his wretched scare scenes. Charismatic Kristen Bell goes a long way in easing the pain as a college student who discovers what's going on. The great, twitchy, rat-faced actor Brad Dourif has a small role as a doomsayer in a cafe."
Trailer of the original Japanese movie,
Kairo:




The Breed 
(2006, dir. Nicholas Mastandrea)
Here we have Wes Craven as the "executive producer" of the directorial début of the perennial second-unit director Nicholas Mastandrea, who's played second fiddle again ever since (Hamlet 2 [2008 / trailer], anyone?). And what do you know! A "Wes Craven Presents" that doesn't suck donkey dick! Or, at least, we didn't think it did, but like most people who have seen the movie, we also wouldn't call it a masterpiece, or essential, or really even a movie worth bothering with. (As the SciFiMoviePage says, "No doubt bonuses were paid out to all the actors who could play those scenes with a straight face.")
Trailer to
The Breed:
The Breed is one of many college-age horrors starring people too old to play teens or college students, one of a substantially smaller number but nevertheless not rare "nature gone wild" movies, and neither all that fun as a crappy flick or all that great as a not-crappy flick. We would assume that Michelle Rodriguez's participation was based more on her then relatively recent drug bust (and related loss of her part on Lost [2005-2010]) than on her appreciation of the script. The other in-the-meantime minor big name, Taryn Manning (of Zombie Apocalypse [2011]), wasn't even a C-name at the time — or was she? (Different names carry different weight over here in Europe.)
Sarah Hates Your Movie has the plot: "Wes Craven sullies his once-good name just a little bit more by 'presenting' another nonsensical horror movie. A group of obnoxiously well-off teenagers fly out to an island for a weekend of partying, only to find themselves being victimised by a pack of rabid dogs. And, that's it." Sarah really hated the movie.
The Breed has, of course, the typically stupid shock ending that defies logic and negates any concept of a happy end. (See: the ending of the original Nightmare on Elm Street [1984, Part II], which was of course conveniently ignored for Dream Warriors [1987, Part III] — as normal in teen horror flicks.)



Paris, je t'aime 
(2006) 
Wes Craven goes art film — he is one of 22 directors who worked on this anthology film, the 18 different short episodes of which are set in different Parisian arrondissements. (Long ago and in another life, we lived in the 9th — and loved it.) Two arrondissements, the 11th and 15th, oddly enough, are not represented in this 120-minute-long movie. Craven's segment is entitled Père-Lachaise, after the fabulously beautiful graveyard located in the 20th arrondissement where the segment is set. (Some of you out there might know it as the place where Jim Morrison is buried. He is but one minor name among many bigger.) Paris, je t'aime (2006) was later followed, so to speak, by New York, I Love You (2008 / trailer) and Rio, Eu Te Amo (2014 / trailer).
Trailer:
Imdb has the plot of Craven's segment: "William and Frances (Rufus Sewell [of Dark City (1998)] and Emily Mortimer) are a British couple staying in Paris on their honeymoon (although they've yet to marry). As they wander around the Père Lachaise graveyard, she half-jokes that William is always so serious and doesn't have any sense of humor or romance. He asks her why she's agreed to marry him, then. They come upon Oscar Wilde's grave. Frances is enthralled, but Williams unimpressed, calling the monument ugly. She gets upset and storms away. William gives chase, but trips and smacks him head against the gravestone. Suddenly, the ghost of Oscar Wilde (Alexander Payne) appears behind him. Oscar gives William some poetic advice about the meaning of love and loss. William, inspired, chases after France, apologizes and wins her back. He offers to take her back to his apartment and make love to her. She agrees and they leave the cemetery arm-in-arm."
Over at Oszus' World, Dennis Schwartz says the movie is: "one of those anthology films that seems like a good idea but never quite works because it lacks the vision of one filmmaker to put it all together. [...] It covers the range from drama, romance, comedy, mime, and even vampire movies. It's pretty much a stunningly beautiful 'postcard' view of a Paris that tourists might not usually visit, that tries to stretch the skits into something a bit heavier; especially, when it attempts to cover stories about a missing child, racial tensions, a woman dying from cancer and ticklish romantic situations, but the serendipitous narratives are too short to have power and almost all can be quickly forgotten. It remains of interest merely as an exercise in acting and filmmaking, but otherwise has little value."



The Hills Have Eyes 2
(2007, dir. Martin Weisz)

The Hills Have Eyes (2006) remake was a hit — so exactly a year later, the sequel hit the market, supposedly once again written by Wes and his son Jonathon. The German director Weisz, who had previously made the German "based on a true story" exploiter Rohtenburg (2006, aka Grimm Love, trailer) replaced Aja, in what was to be Weisz's last movie until 2014, when he released the direct-to-DVD unknown Squatters (trailer). The Hills Have Eyes 2 was critically panned; we actually began watching it one late night but fell asleep, so we cannot say anything about it — but we are sure it is much, much better than the very first The Hills Have Eyes 2 (1984, see Part II).
Trailer:

Reel Talk has the plot: "Set two years after the events in the first movie, The Hills Have Eyes 2 focuses on a new group of individuals who will end up as the victims of cannibal mutants living in an area of the New Mexico desert. This time, a handful of green National Guard trainees, made up of such stock archetypes as the Slow Fat Guy and the Dangerous Hothead, are serving themselves up for the cinematic slaughter. Assigned to help out a team of scientists at a desert base, the soldiers arrive to find the place abandoned, with someone apparently trapped in the surrounding hills seeking help. Some investigate while some stay behind, but soon, all of the troops fall under attack by the deformed derelicts who call the area's caves and old mines their home. One by one the soldiers are killed off, forcing the survivors to band together, save what little ammunition they have, and do whatever it takes to stay alive."
Blood Brothers says, "This remake franchise is completely baffling. The initial remake of the Wes Craven classic was a sleek, brutal, and intense leap that proved French director Aja was a legit new force in horror cinema. Everything about its theatrically released sequel [...] is as bad as the first entry was good. It's completely illogical, it's by the numbers in many of its aspects, and the execution for the film can be downright jaw dropping in ineptness. It leaves one a bit speechless."



Diary of the Dead
(2007, writ. & dir. George Romero)

Actually, to even include this flick here is sort of a joke, as all Wes Craven does is give his (uncredited) voice as an newscaster — as do Quentin Tarantino, Stephen King, Simon Pegg, and Guillermo del Toro. Diary is the fifth of the to-date six "living dead" films written and directed by Romero; our favorite remains the first one, Night of the Living Dead(1968). For Diary, Romero jumped on the "found-footage" bandwagon — first practiced in Cannibal Holocaust (1980 / trailer) but made popular by Blair Witch Project [1999 / trailer] and then used by way too many other movies — to present his typical zombie flick as a social metaphor narrative.
Trailer:
Romero-fan Final Girl, who admits "I really disliked it", has the plot: "A group college kids are off in the woods filming a no-budget mummy movie when they hear reports on the radio about a few dead people returning to life and making with the chomp-chomp on the living. The kids are unsure what to think, but they decide to stop filming and head home. They pile into a Winnebago and have various wacky and gross zombie-laden adventures all caught on camera by mummy-movie director Jason (Josh Close), who can't put down the camera because he is the voice of truth!"
The voice of truth is not good, according to Notes of a Film Fanatic: "Using the video diary form first practiced in The Blair Witch Project,* Romero strives for the same kind of you-are-there authenticity but botches the effort by allowing his didactic, ham-fisted social commentary, conveyed via thudding mouthpiece dialogue and overblown voiceover narration, to overshadow the zombie horror. [...] Romero is delivering a sermon about media responsibility in this age of 24-hour cable news channels, digital video, YouTube, etc., but when the zombie apocalypse really does come down (and it will, oh, it will), the last thing I'll need is a lecture from a painfully out-of-touch old fuddy-duddy. I will need guns — lots of them — in order to do battle with the rampaging zombies. But until then I need a gun for another reason: to put a bullet in the head of Romero's zombie franchise."
* Here we must say they are wrong: that honor belongs to Cannibal Holocaust (1980).



The Tripper
(2007, dir. Deputy Dewey)

 
"No hippies or Republicans were harmed in this film."

Aka President Evil. Deputy Dewey from Craven's Scream franchise, otherwise known as the former Mr. Courteney Cox or, on occasion, as David Arquette, directs a horror film! The Tripper is actually on our "To See" list, but we haven't gotten around to it yet. According to some sources, Wes Craven makes a non-speaking cameo in the movie as the (old) hippie wearing a top hat. Deputy Dewey co-wrote the movie with Joe Harris, who few years previously was involved in the not-so-hot horror flick Darkness Falls (2003 / trailer).

Trailer:
A lot of (US) Americans seem to dislike this movie, but then, a lot of (US) Americans are think Donald Trump is viable presidential material. The title, The Tripper, is obviously enough a play on Ronald "The Senile" Reagan's nickname, "The Gipper". Typical of the negative comments would be those of Movie Censorship, which says: "David Arquette's political backwood slasher The Tripper is a barely entertaining movie with a handful of well-known actors, a quaint killer, and quite a few heavy splatter scenes. Apparently, amateur film makers are not the only ones who go out to the woods with a couple of friends to make a little horror flick — Hollywood stars are in for it, too."
 
Crimson Quill, however, is less critical of the movie:  "[...] An homage to the exploitation flicks of Craven and Tobe Hooper set against the backdrop of a free love festival in mother nature's back yard, Northern California. [...] Slashers in the eighties were often lambasted for their moral bankruptcy with their outlook and one could be forgiven for believing that The Tripper has a very strong political agenda. [...] There is plentiful political subtext, none of which is implemented with any kind of subtlety whatsoever, but it was never Arquette's sole intention to school our asses. [...] That's the strength of it, no deep hidden meaning other than that of equal rights for one and all, his movie was only concerned with entertaining the pants off its audience and, on this count, it performed rather well indeed. [...] Being an equal rights commentator, Arquette ensures that we are given ample naked flesh of both sexes and seasons his treat with lashings of delectable grue as Ronnie (Christopher Allen Nelson) dispatches with gay abandon using his woodsman's axe to chop up any deadwood en route. Limbs are relocated, arteries spray and there's more than enough grue to sate all but the most ferocious appetites."
Behind the Couch has the plot: "A group of free-loving, pot-smoking, acid-dropping hippies attend a music and camping festival only to find themselves stalked and brutally butchered by an axe-wielding psychotic killer wearing a Ronald Reagan mask. Aided by his faithful killer dog, Nancy. Naturally." The Final Girl, "Samantha", is played by Jaime King (of My Bloody Valentine 3D [2009]).



Last House on the Left 
(2009, dir. Dennis Iliadis)
David Hess, 19 September 1936 – 7 October 2011, (of the original version) was offered a cameo but said no.
It's hard to ask "Why bother remaking this movie?" when the first version itself was a "remake" of another movie, The Virgin Spring (1960). Nevertheless, why bother remaking this movie?

Trailer:

According to some sources, Wes Craven was inspired in part to produce this watered-down, better-budgetedremake of his first shocker of the same name from 1972 because of the lack of success of the rip-off version from 2005, Chaos. The success of the 2006 remake of The Hills Have Eyes probably also added fuel to the fire — money is money is money, and one never has enough it. Craven produced, Craven presented, the remake was a commercial success, Craven made money. But much like the likewise similarly unneeded and mercenary remake of I Spit on Your Grave (2010 / trailer) which came a year later, we haven't seen bothered watching Last House on the Left— though we are sure that on a technical level, both remakes are probably better made than the originals.
Music used in the movie —
Sweet Child o' Mine by Taken by Trees:

Ancient Slumber has the plot, which "is essentially the same as the original with a few minor cosmetic changes, but for those who haven't had the pleasure it goes something like this — John (Tony Goldwyn) and Emma (Monica Potter) Collingwood go to their lakeside summer house with their teenage daughter Mari (Sara Paxton of The Innkeepers [2011]). After arriving Mari takes the family car and visits her friend Paige (Martha Maclsaac of Dead Before Dawn [2012]), who works in the local convenience store. Overhearing the girls talking about smoking pot, a teenage boy called Justin (Spencer Treat Clark) invites the girls back to his motel room to indulge in a little narcotic usage, but just when Justin, Paige and Mari are starting to enjoy themselves they are interrupted by Justin's escaped convict father Krug (Garret Dillahunt), his lover Sadie (Riki Lindhome) and his brother Frank (Aaron Paul), and they're not happy. Not wanting to risk being caught, the gang kidnap the girls, steal their car and head out into the country where Krug and his cronies proceed to torture and rape the girls before heading off the seek shelter from an oncoming storm. Unfortunately the house they choose to seek shelter in belongs to the Collingwoods, and once John and Emma twig what has been happening, the fun really starts…"

Chuck Norris Ate My Baby liked the movie, pointing out: "What works about the film in comparison to the original, is the fact that it is a glossy and well-crafted update. [...] I've already seen a grimy and grungy version of The Last House on the Left, so seeing the story with a different pallet actually gives the film its own identity. To be a successful remake, there needs to be a separation form the source material and to go with a stylistic and well-crafted version is a major departure from 72's Last House. [...] While I love Craven's Last House, and consider it an exploitation classic, it is certainly not without its problems. Two that immediately come to mind are some of the dialogue scenes between the parents as well as everything involving the two police officers. Overall, in this update, the dialogue is solid and mostly natural for all the characters, including the teenage girls, the rents and the gang of psychos."
More music used in the movie —
Sweet Love for Planet Earth by Fuck Buttons:





My Soul to Take
(2010, writ. & dir.  Wes Craven)

For the first time since Freddy's New Nightmare (1994, Part IV), Craven directs his own script again! And he also goes 3D — 'cause, like, it's cinematic art. In any event, despite the 3D and despite major reshoots and rewrites that delayed the movie's release, My Soul to Take bombed. It received a Fangoria Chainsaw Award nomination for "Worst Film"; we were unable to find out to which film it lost. We sort of want to one day see both flicks.
Trailer:
Love Horror has the plot: "Abel Plainkoff (Raúl Esparza) is a man with multiple personalities (one of which is particularly evil) who turns out to be a serial killer, which is news to him. As he realises this and calls his therapist for help, the dark side of him takes full control and attempts to kill his pregnant wife and young daughter.Police arrive just in time to save the little girl, but the mother isn't so lucky. Abel gets shot and sent to hospital, restrained (because he just won't die), but somewhere along the line he escapes and disappears. 16 years later, and a large group of teens gather at the spot where the killer vanished. Seven of the group share a birthday, which happens to be the anniversary of when Plainkoff's killing spree was put to an end. But their taunting and trivialising of the event seems to awaken something, and the following day it looks like the psychopath is back from the grave to continue his murderous rampage, starting with the 7 kids who were born on that same fateful night."
365 Horror Movies is of the opinion that "The two things that the film does have going for it are 1. It's an original horror movie and 2. The teens actually look like teens. No 40-year-olds with five o'clock shadows at 6am. Oh, and the condor scene in the classroom is pretty awesome. It's not supposed to be the scariest scene, but, in fact, it's easily the best scene in the film by a mile, which pretty much says everything ones needs to know about this film."
Birth Movies Death, however, offers a description that makes My Soul to Take sound like our kind of movie: "His worst movie, My Soul to Take, is perhaps one of the all-time great bad movies, a train wreck of monumental proportions that is incredibly entertaining and watchable and should, frankly, be a cult classic."




A Nightmare on Elm Street
(2010, dir. Samuel Bayer)
Another Craven film gets rebooted, but for a change Craven was vocally opposed to it — perhaps because the producers decided not to use him as a consultant or co-producer or in any way that might have lined his pocket more than as just the creator of the original characters? We personally weren't of any strong opinion regarding the remake: Michael Bay and his Platinum Dunes production company did, after all, do one of our favorite remakes — The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003 / trailer) — but, in turn, also did one of the major fuck-ups of reboots, Friday the 13th (2009 / trailer). And it isn't exactly as if there was any integrity left to the character after all the "funny" nightmare movies, so a "serious" take that remembered that Freddy was a child-fucking killer didn't sound too bad. We already began to lose interest, however, when we saw who was writing the movie — Wesley Strick wrote The Glass House (2001), fer Christ's sake — and how old the cast was (indeed, considering the real age of the Elm Street kids and how old they actually looked, we couldn't help but think that they should have re-set the movie in a college). Thus, A Nightmare on Elm Street coming so close on the heels of the turkey that is 2009's Friday the 13th, we ended up skipping the flick. It seems to have been a hit, though.
Trailer:
The Science Fiction, Horror and Fantasy Film Review, which is of the opinion that "Most of the Platinum Dunes remakes disappointingly fail to hold any kind of candle up to their predecessors – [...] this new A Nightmare on Elm Street is no different", has the plot, in case you didn't know it: "In a diner, Dean Russell (Kellan Lutz) abruptly slashes his own throat after not having slept for several days. A group of his friends from high school realise they are all having dreams about a sinister figure wearing a glove of steel claws. When the figure kills them in their dreams, each of them dies in the real world. As they desperately try to stay awake and stop themselves falling into dream, Nancy Holbrook (Rooney Mara) learns that the dream figure is Freddy Krueger (Jackie Earle Haley of Damnation Alley [1977 / trailer] and Dollman [1991 / trailer]). She uncovers that Freddy was the janitor at their preschool when they were five years old. Believing that Freddy was molesting the children, their parents pursued and set him on fire. Though their parents have made every effort to cover this up, Freddy has now returned to take revenge against the children in their dreams."
Kindertauma saw the movie and experienced what we feared we would: "I don't BELIEVE this new polished and skinned version. I don't believe that girl is in high school, I don't believe she dresses and wears her hair like that, I don't believe that's her house, her mom, her friends. I REALLY don't believe that a preschool would hire a creepy guy like Fred Krueger to be their live-in gardener (?) and to room in the school's basement (?) and that he would have private access to the children. This is a universe that doesn't play by any of reality's rules and yet the entire plot hinges on the destruction of such rules but yet they don't even exist in the first place… [...]. I just watched THE ENTIRE Elm Street series back to back and never once did I feel bored. I may have laughed at how crappy some of the later ones now seem but I never wanted to take a nap instead of finishing one. I've never fallen asleep in a theater either, I think that's an insane thing to do but while watching this recent redo of N.O.E.S. I actually felt sleepy and BORED. [...]"



Scream 4
(2011, dir. Wes Craven)

Aka Scre4m. Ain't no such thing as beating a dead horse as long as it's still breathing. Fifteen years after the first movie, and 11 years after the last, the Scream trilogy becomes a quadrilogy. Exciting. The four main characters were back for the ride, as was scriptwriter Kevin Williamson (who unofficially sort of got eased out of the project and had his script re-written). A hit, as to be expected, sadly enough it is also the last movie that Craven was to direct before the Big C got to him.
 Trailer:
Urban Cinefile has the plot: "A decade has passed and Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell of Wild Things [1998 / trailer]), has got herself together and is now the author of a self-help book. She returns home to Woodsboro — the last stop of her book tour — where she reconnects with Sheriff Dewey (David Arquette of Ravenous [1999 / trailer] and 8-Legged Freaks [2002 / trailer]) and Gale (Courtney Cox of 3000 Miles to Graceland [2001]), who are now married, as well as her cousin Jill (Emma Roberts) and her Aunt Kate (Mary McDonnell). Unfortunately, Sidney's appearance also brings about the return of Ghostface (voice of Dane Farwell), putting Sidney, Gale, and Dewey, along with Jill, her friends, and the whole town of Woodsboro in danger."
Daily Dead is of the opinion that Scream 4 "is a direct sequel and you won't appreciate this film as much if you haven't seen the first three movies. On top of referencing other horror films, there are many references to past quotes or events in the Scream series that will be lost to someone only watching Scream 4. [...] I'm happy to say that the film continues to build over the second and third act into a really strong sequel." This positive attitude seems to be shared by the majority of those who have seen the movie.

Final Girl, who likewise thinks that "much of that enjoyment stems from an affection for earlier entries in the series" but also opinions that "Cash-grab, by the way, smells a bit like Aviance Night Musk by Prince Matchabelli for Women" and that is a semi-exception: "Scream 4 is so self-referential and meta (even dropping hints about, say, the real-life marital discord between Cox and Arquette) that it's become a mobius strip, and ouroboros feeding off of its own history and cleverness. At times, it almost sinks into the realm of complete parody. There is some seriously broad overacting going throughout, the type better suited to Scary Movie than a scary movie. [...] Though the cast is full of red herrings and the violence is vicious and brutal, the film quickly falls into a pattern: phone call, oh no!, die. I suppose, perhaps, that was always the Scream formula, but here it just seems like a journey from beat to beat. There may be jump scares, but there's not much tension. It's capable, like all Wes Craven movies are. After it was over, I began thinking about that — what makes a Wes Craven movie a Wes Craven movie? Does anything? Scream 4 could have been directed by anyone who knows what they're doing behind the camera and the results wouldn't be much different. It's just sort of there and you like it well enough even though things slide into JUST END ALREADY-land once the killer is revealed, but...you know. It's enjoyable, if rote."



The Girl in the Photographs
(2015, dir. Nick Simon)

Wes Craven is credited as an executive producer of this independent horror movie. The Hollywood Reporter likes it, and says:"A creepy and quirky suburban slasher whose prosaic script is boosted by a playful sense of style, not to mention a welcome sense of humor, The Girl in the Photographs marks an amusingly gory sophomore effort from writer-director Nick Simon (who co-penned the screenplay for Fox's The Pyramid [2014 /trailer])."
The usually forgiving Arrow in the Head, however, does not, and says: "Being that The Girl in the Photographs bears the name of the late Wes Craven as an executive producer, I wish I could tell you that the last film to have the maestro's seal of approval was something that would please his legions of fans. Despite having been chosen to play the Toronto International Film Festival's prestigious Midnight Madness genre selection, The Girl in the Photographs is a mean-spirited, vacuous genre effort that's little more than an extended exercise in style with barely a thimble of content to sustain it."
More Horror has the plot: "It's the story of young South Dakota resident and grocery store clerk, Colleen (Claudia Lee). Colleen's rather lackluster life is turned upside down when a mysterious photographer begins to stalk her, leaving bloody, grisly photographs for her to find, each depicting the aftermath of what appears to be astonishing violence. After the photographs are dismissed by the police as fakes, they wind up going viral online, eventually catching the attention of renowned Los Angeles photographer, Peter Hemmings (Kal Penn of Dementamania [2013 / trailer]). Hemmings, who immediately notices the unmistakable influence of his own work in the gory photographs, decides to roll into town to investigate the situation. He brings with him his assistant, Chris (Kenny Wormald) and several of the models with which he works, one of whom is his girlfriend. He also meets and is intrigued by Colleen and her wholesome good looks. Eventually, Colleen's deranged stalkers cross paths with Hemmings and his Hollywood entourage, of course. Suspense and slayings aplenty ensue as one might expect."
By the time you read this, there might be a trailer out there — but there wasn't the day we uploaded this blog entry.




And an Addendum:
The Opening of Misty Beethoven
(1976, dir. "Henry Paris" aka Radley Metzger)

And lastly, and addendum: another film project that fits into Craven's early days in the film business, the period looked at in Part I.
The Rialto Report, that fabulous and continually interesting website dedicated to the historical documentation of "adult movies", dug up a release form (see below) for Radley Metzger's The Opening of Misty Beethoven (1976), a classic porn movie from the day and age when they still tried to be serious movies. Misty Beethoven's working title was "Society", and Craven signed on to play a character named "Michal". You see him? We didn't — but we enjoyed the movie anyway.

10K Bulletshas the plot: "Seymour Love (Jamie Gillis) is a sexologist who believes that he can transform Misty Beethoven (Constance Money), a second-rate whore, into the next Golden Rod Girl. Seymour with the help of his friend Geraldine (Jacqueline Beaudant) have to work at a feverish pace with Misty in order to have here ready for Lawrence Layman a vane magazine publishers next high-society party."
Basically, a sexed-up version of the Pygmalion story which, despite all the sex, is actually less sexist than that earlier version, My Fair Lady (1964 / trailer).
 Short clip with theme song:

Teenage Caveman (USA, 2002)

$
0
0
In all truth, for the main gist of the following review, you can skip down to the final paragraph... but read on, should our normal meandering and verbosity interest you in any way.

(Spoilers.) Way back around the turn of the century, the cheap horror movies of yesteryear suddenly became a source of new product for the American film industry. Dark Castle Entertainment, for example, was founded (initially) to make new versions of the films of William Castle (see: 13 Ghosts [2002 / trailer] and House on Haunted Hill [1999 / trailer]), while Platinum Dunes looked less far back in time and brought us updated versions of trash classics and semi-classics such as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre [2003 / trailer], The Amityville Horror [2005 / trailer], and others. The American cable channel Cinemax also followed suit (if with far lower budgets) and, in 2001, under the banner "Creature Features", broadcast a series of five extremely loose and cheaply made "remakes" of "classic" B movies that the great Samuel Z. Arkoff had originally produced for AIP in the 50s and 60s — the very films many a Gen Xer had grown up watching on their local creature-feature show. (The new versions were produced by Arkoff's son Lou Arkoff and, oddly enough, comedy starlet and former Playboy model Colleen Camp [below, in her prime].) All five TV movies were subsequently released on DVD, and while none enjoyed any great praise or popularity, this one here, Teenage Caveman was perhaps the most reviled.
We ourselves stumbled upon Teenage Caveman in a bargain-basement barrel, and while drawn to it only due to the inanity of the concept of such a remake, we probably would never have tossed down the 50 cents to buy it were it not for the name of the movie's director: Larry Clark. In the art world of the 70s and 80s, Larry Clark had had some success, fortune, and infamy as a photographer of the drug-, alcohol-, and sex-fueled naked underbelly of teenage America. And like a variety of other, more respectable art stars of the generation — e.g., Robert Longo (Johnny Mnemonic [1995 / trailer]), Cindy Sherman (Office Killer [1997 / trailer]), David Salle (Search and Destroy [1995 / trailer]) and Julian Schnabel — when given the chance to move into movie-making in the mid-1990s, he went for it and brought out the scandal movie Kids (1995 / trailer), which focused on the drug-, alcohol-, and sex-filled life of teens confronted with HIV. (And launched the careers of Chloë Sevigny, Rosario "Hot Stuff" Dawson, & Harmony Korine [the director of Gummo (1997 / trailer) and Trash Humpers (2009 / trailer)].) Since then, Clark remains, alongside Schnabel, one of the select few of the bigger art names of the 80s to still be regularly active as a filmmaker.
In any event, the concept of a cheap teen horror flick directed by a "name" ephebophiliac artist intrigued us enough to plop down 50 cents for the DVD and, three years later, to finally pop the flick into the DVD player. And we must say that although we had no expectations, we were disappointed by Teenage Caveman... even as we must admit that the cheap flick probably is in many way exactly what one might expect from a man obsessed with the sex and drug lives of teenagers: sleazy, and full of teens having sex and doing drugs and drinking. Just, the fixation on teenage sex and drug abuse is obsessive to the point of discomfort: the flick makes you, as the viewer, feel sort of dirty after awhile. Also, none in the cast of newbies really excels as a thespian, the jokes are few and mostly flat, tension is virtually non-existence, and the main bad guy (Richard Hillman [13 Dec 1974 — 27 June 2009] as Neil) overacts to the point of being almost unwatchable.
About the only thing that the 2002 version of Teenage Caveman has in common with the original 1958 version — directed by Roger Corman as Prehistoric World, released in England as Out of Darkness, and starring Robert Vaughn [of Unwed Mother [1958 / trailer], Starship Invasions [1977 / trailer], Battle Beyond the Stars [1980 / trailer], Killing Birds [1987 / trailer], Transylvania Twist [1989/ trailer], and much, much more]) — is the post-apocalyptic setting. But unlike in the original film, in which this fact is the film's final denouement, we know relatively quickly (with the movie's first and perhaps only intentional laugh involving a "no skateboarding" sign) that in Clark's version, the primitive world of the protagonists is post-apocalyptic.
At its onset, Teenage Caveman seems to hold some promise, despite its obvious threadbare budget and thespian inadequacies. Namely, the new world order back at the communal cave looks to contain the seeds of dramatic tension, and Clark's obsession with sex, not yet in visual overload, is instead reflected in an interesting plot point: Shaman (Paul Hipp), the leader of the tribe and father of our handsome hero David (Andrew Keegan), is a David Koresh-like, fanatically religious, hypocritical, and corrupt tribal leader who forbids sex within the tribe but reserves the God-given right to fuck all the young girls. (An underlying thematic point of the movie, though well hidden, is that of the corruption of power.) Shaman makes the mistake of deciding to bone his son's gal Sarah (Tara Subkoff of The Notorious Bettie Page [2005 / trailer]), and before you can finish reading a Penthouse Forum letter, Shaman is dead and David is tied to the stake outside the cave in an obvious homage to that gay icon of the religious martyrs, St. Sebastian. (Clark's camera loves his hairy armpit and man nipples.) But what are real friends for but to help you escape and leave the tribe in search of a better life? And thus the scraggly group of contumacious teens hit the road...
A radioactive rainstorm later, they awaken in the luxury apartment decorated with Jeff Koons art pieces belonging to Neil and his female counterpart Judith, (Tiffany Limos), and before the plot continues the movie stagnates for an interminable amount of time on the introduction of our innocent group to the wicked world of sex and drugs, for which they must pay dearly later. Make no mistake: Clark may wallow in nudity and sex and drugs, but this is an extremely anti-sex film. Much like in the slashers of the 80s, in Teenage Caveman having sex basically means you're going to die. But though Clark displays a desire to punish his innocents for their being corrupted, he wants to have his cake, too, and thus first casts a long, prolonged, narrative- and mood-crippling gaze on barely post-pubescent breasts of the young girls and the naked butts (or stuffed underwear) of the young boys. (Note: sex scenes as filmed by Clark are a perfect opportunity to get a new beer or empty your bladder.) Oddly enough, for all his fascination in the body of the barely hairy and cheap-looking store-bought underwear — Payless obviously survived the apocalypse — Clark lacks the cojones to do a full frontal of a male, though he does many of the girls.
For that, however, he does have the cojones to film perhaps one of the most audacious, transgressive scenes we've ever seen in a Pay TV movie: when Elizabeth (Crystal Celeste Grant) begins to suffer the after-effects of unprotected sex with the genetically modified duo, the "good" villainess Judith begins to masturbate — and then gets pissed when the young lady literally explodes prematurely. (Needless to say, Judith is no better a person than the main villain of the movie, Neil.) Why does Elizabeth explode? Neil and Judith are genetically altered super-humans, and much like HIV, their traits are transferred virally through body fluids. But most normal bodies cannot survive the conversion to superdom and self-destruct — not good.
Like so many badly made movies, in Teenage Caveman there is little tension felt as the  characters die one by one until there is but the final girl and final guy and main villain and the final showdown, which in itself might have been funny were the movie not so exhausting and repulsive to sit through up till that point. To give Clark justifiable credit again, however, he ends the movie in a subtly depressing manner that is at least 100% in line with his obvious anti-sex attitude and his less obvious theme of the corruption of power. But being true to a vision doesn't mean that the vision is any good, or worth your time watching.
Teenage Caveman, in short: An anti-sex and ultimately depressing film made by an ephebophiliac man who obviously prefers to punish the victim, the movie is hampered by bad acting, a low budget, a total lack of suspense, and terrible pacing. The gore ranges from well-made to cheesy, but despite a blood-drenched money shot or two, none are good or bad enough to make them worth waiting for — with the possible exception of the exploding belly & masturbation scene, which could really fit well in a Richard Kern flick. The sex and drugs scenes are alienating and dull, and oddly repulsive, sort of as if you have sudden insight to the sexual fantasies of the wanna-be paedophile next door. Neither the director nor scriptwriter evidence any real talent in their craft, and the themes and possibilities of the narrative appear and disappear indiscriminately. By the end of the movie the only thing one realizes, really feels, really knows, is that Teenage Caveman is one fucked up film and a total waste of time.
Not surprisingly, rumor has it that another remake is in the works.
Trailer to the original
Teenage Caveman (1958):

Short Film: Un Chien Andalou / An Andalusian Dog (France, 1929)

$
0
0
We are continually surprised at how many people have not yet seen this film. Sure, everyone who's ever gone to art school or studied filmmaking has seen it, but if you get down to it, that's a smaller group than you might imagine. Indeed, recently we were at a table of film fanatics, and we proved to be the only one who had ever seen this early masterpiece of Surreal cinema co-written by Salvador Domingo Felipe Jacinto Dalí i Domènech, Marqués de Dalí de Pubol (11 May 1904 — 23 Jan 1989) and directed and co-written by Luis Buñuel Portolés (22 Feb 1900 — 29 July 1983). (But then, we did go to art school in another life.) Though "the most famous short film ever made" (according to Roger Ebert [18 June 1942 — 4 April 2013]), it would seem that while masses of people out there may have heard of it, masses have also yet to see it. We would like to do our bit at correcting this hole in the education of the general film fan.
We won't talk too much about what the film is about, for despite all the possible interpretations, Freudian and otherwise, we have always tended to believe Buñuel's insistence that there is no meaning to be found in the string of scenes collected from his and Dali's dreams and imagination. As Buñuel once explained, "Our only rule [when writing the script] was very simple: no idea or image that might lend itself to a rational explanation of any kind would be accepted. We had to open all doors to the irrational and keep only those images that surprised us, without trying to explain why."
Assuming this is true and not a later reimagining of intention — similar, for example, to scriptwriter Joe Eszterhas's later ascertain that he meant Paul Verhoeven's Showgirls (1995 / trailer) to be as funny as it is — then at best the movie is an example of how anything can be interpreted and given meaning should one choose to. Above all, what the young Surrealists were doing back in 1929 was simply trying to aggressively attack the common form and structure of film. They did a good job, as you can well imagine that that which still shocks (in parts) today, was a full slap in the face in 1929.
Un Chien Andalou / An Andalusian Dogwas the directorial debut of Luis Buñuel, whose other known previous screen credits are that of assistant director on Jean Epstein's screen adaptation of Mauprat (1926 / full movie, French subtitles) and Mario Nalpas & Henri Étiévant's Papitou / Siren of the Tropics (1927 / Joséphine Baker dancing), a co-scriptwriting credit on Epstein's later horror film, The Fall of the House of Usher (1928 / full movie, French subtitles), and a small acting part in Jacques Feyder's Carmen (1926 / from the soundtrack). Buñuel, who went on to be rather famous as a filmmaker, appears in the opening scene of this film as the macho smoker who slits the eye. The young Dali is also seen briefly in the film, as one of the two priests being dragged behind the two grand pianos laden with dead donkeys (he's at your right above).
Of the others who appear in the film: the actress playing the woman whose eye is slit, Simone Mareuil, killed herself at the age of 55 by self-immolation on a public square on 24 October 1954, while Pierre Batcheff (born 23 June 1907), the man dressed as a nun, supposedly died of an overdose of veronal on 12 April 1932. The other most notable face of the movie, the attractively androgynous woman on the street, is played by Fano Messan (1902-1998), a mostly forgotten woman sculptor who, like Marlene, liked to wear men's clothing; active in the Parisian cultural scene of late 20s, among other artists she posed for is one of our favorites, Kees van Dongen (26 January 1877 – 28 May 1968). That's his painting of her above.
In any event, enjoy this month's short film: An Andalusian Dog.

Art of the Devil II / Long khong (Thailand, 2005)

$
0
0

One of two follow-up movies to Tanit Jitnukul's original horror movie of the same name (2004 / trailer), Art of the Devil ll is a titular sequel only and is completely unrelated to the first film. (Art of the Devil III [2008 / trailer], in turn, while likewise only titularly related to Art I, is a prequel to this movie.) The shared narrative aspect of all three horror films, all of which were highly successful in their homeland but haven't exactly gained much notice elsewhere, is that of black magic.
That said, let's take a closer look at the film at hand, which was pulled from our pile of "mystery DVDs" (i.e., don't when or why or how it was procured) and watched last week with an audience of four. Art of the Devil ll also elicited four different reactions: one person said "That sucked"; another dismissed it with "That was gross"; a third said "That was an enjoyably bad movie"; and lastly came the protestation, "Hey, it was a pretty good flick". We were the protesting party. For: "Sucked" it did not, "gross" it often was, and a "bad movie" in the sense of psychotronic fun or fun crap like Showgirls (1995 / trailer) or The Hottie and the Nottie (2008 / trailer) it is most definitely not. And we ourselves at least founds the movie often rather horrific.
True, The Art of the Devil II may be low-culture trash, as body-count and other genre films generally are, but it is also interesting in many ways and easily retains viewer interest, and not just because of the exotic factor. (This alone makes it way better than most movies out there, and not just genre films.) Like many Asian films the editing sometimes overly streamlines the narrative, not only moving the story forward in jumps but also resulting in gaps that require some quick and creative thinking on the part of the viewer. Still, considering that the movie was directed by seven directors (Pasith Buranajan, Kongkiat Khomsiri,Isara Nadee, Seree Phongnithi, Yosapong Polsap, Putipong Saisikaew andArt Thamthrakul), Art of the Devil ll is not only surprisingly coherent, but the acting passable to excellent. In this regard, the evil woman of the film, the total MILF teacher Mrs. Panor (Napakpapha Nakprasitte), excels: sexy throughout, she succeeds at different points to convey likability, pain, seductiveness, bitchiness, pure evil — in other words, the full gamut needed to become a convincing character. It is not surprising that she was nominated for acting awards that year by both the Bangkok Critics Assembly as well as the Thailand National Film Association. (The various no names that play the fodder don't excel in any way, but considering that dubbing usually makes bad actors even worse and they merely come across as weak, they do a perfectly acceptable job.)
The basic plot of Art of the Devil ll has little to do with art, other than that there are a few obscure references to tattoos and the MILF also has some devilish body art. The basic plot involves a group of students returning to their countryside home after two years in the big city for the funeral of the father of their friend, Ta (Namo Tongkumnerd, also of Art of the Devil III and 407 Dark Flight 3D [2014 / trailer]), who stayed behind in the backwaters of Thailand. But things are not as they seem in them there backwaters, and come nightfall the realization comes that the sins of the past are now demanding their due. 
Ghosts and dead people play a part in a moral tail that is anything but gore lite and that also (Thank god!) lacks the Asian (e.g., Japanese and Korean) obsession with long-haired ghosts. The moral to the tale is a simple one: don't fuck around with black magic. Black magic, however, is the shared sin of all those in the movie, and they pay dearly for their sins; the dark arts are even at the foundation of the final twist of the movie, a twist that we for one did not see coming. (Indeed, a slow-dawning twist of Art of the Devil ll is the realization that the evil MILF was, basically, driven to madness and evil by all those around her, and that she became what she is due to desperation caused by factors that she had no control of. Be careful of what you create, we must say.)
The horror in Art of the Devil ll is of the illogical supernatural type, in that the way it manifests itself is often more nightmarishly inane than fully understandable. Much like, say, in the great granddaddy of all Gothic horror novels, Horace Walpole's The Castle of Otranto, in which the about-to-marry Conrad dies by being crushed by a gigantic helmet falling from the sky, there is often no logical explanation why something happens or why some die in a specific way, other than it is supernatural. Two deaths that perfectly exemplify this would be the first one, in which a man (whom we later learn was the local gym teacher) suffers fishhooks emerging from beneath his skin, and the death of Ko [Pavarit Wongpanitch], who suffers a similar fate, only this time it's living lizards that bloodily and fatally force themselves out from under his skin. Bloody, but why fishhooks or lizards? Especially since the evil MILF generally seems to prefer a more hands-on or at least direct approach. But then, black magic and revenge follows no logic but its own.
Amidst all the many gore highlights are other events that are more mundane but nonetheless effectively horrific, as exemplified by the scene in which the group suddenly realize that their half-eaten evening meal is made from their missing friend Noot [Chanida Suriyakompon]. (The scene of granny eating the cat, on the other hand, is more laughable, both because the cat looks so fake and because of Ta's reaction. [He says something to the effect "She's hungry, but a little confused."]) Occasionally, there are moments of unexpectedly subtlety, as in the scene following that in which the group lights incense to ward off evil spirits.
Despite its graphic and gory opening scene, Art of the Devil ll is perhaps a little slow to start, but once the college students are underway and the first brown-tinged flashback kicks in, the movie definitely begins to intrigue. The time-jumping narration works surprisingly well, and the revelations the flashbacks disclose often add an unexpected viewpoint to the events, if not a kick in the gut to the viewer's sympathies at the given point in the movie. (More than one person in the movie has a dark secret, you might say.) The blood-spattered scenes and shocks are often unnerving and cringingly effective, at best both painful and nightmarish. (And not for the squeamish, as the movie often waltzes deep into the sphere of torture porn.) And considering how prudish the young couple Kim (Hataiwan Ngamsukonpusit) and Por (Akarin Siwapornpitak) are at the start of the movie — they barely manage to kiss each other's cheeks — sex plays a huge role in the movie, which features scenes not only of the MILF teacher getting it on with a variety of men, but also infers both a lesbian relationship between two of the group as well as the oral rape of the young students, both female and male, by the gym teacher. (Never graphic, but always unequivocal.) The final twist is not necessarily to be seen in advance — as we've already mentioned, we sure didn't see it coming — but is nevertheless extremely consequent to the black tale told.
Karma is a bitch — and Art of the Devil ll is bitchin'!

Grabbers (Ireland/GB, 2012)

$
0
0
We like to drink. And we know many other people who like to drink. And when we all go out drinking together, we generally have a great time: we're witty and funny and party hardy and life is grand. That is how it is on the side of the bar that drinks, not serves. But on the side that serves, well, in another life that lasted some 15 years, 10 of which was spent serving the drinks — the other 5 were spent hiring and firing those who served them — we learned something: drunk people aren't funny. At least, not if you're not drunk, too. (Luckily, in Berlin, at least in the bars we worked in, drunken bartenders were employable and socially acceptable.)
But we weren't drunk when we watched Grabbers, a comedy monster film, with five similarly sober friends. And though we drank while watching, we never actually got drunk — or at least not drunk enough to enjoy this movie. Seldom were any of us more bored, and seldom have we laughed less.
Grabbers, the basic plot of which involves a remote Irish town that has to drink themselves into a drunken stupor to survive the onslaught of the titular monsters from outer space, which happen to be alergic to alcohol, is one dud of a movie: predictable from start to finish, almost never scary or in any way tense, thin on laughs, and full of unfunny drunken people.
Which isn't to say Grabbers doesn't have a few plus points. For one, it features Bronagh Gallagher (Botched[2007 / trailer] and Malice in Wonderland [2009 / trailer]) in a secondary role with a Betty Page haircut; we would have liked the film even less had she not been present, regardless of how minor her part.* Secondly, it has some truly fine cinematography and the landscape is fabulous — but then, the landscape of Ireland is fabulous, so that must be seen more as a credit to the country and not to this movie. (Believe us: if you've never driven through Ireland, do so; you might decide to move there.) Ditto with the great accents: the Irish lilt is always a pleasure to listen to, but again, this a credit to the land and not the movie. But other than the above three aspects, there is little to recommend in this predictable, almost trite, and definitely neither funny — OK, we did laugh when Dr. Adam Smith (Russell Tovey of Blackwood[2014 / trailer]) went flying through the air, but that was over half-way into the movie already — nor scary monster film.
*Her little exchange about renting the bridal suite reminded me of an exchange I had many years ago in Cork, but in reverse, in a sense. Having travelled through Ireland for 14 days with an Irishwoman friend — as in, non-sexual friendship — we arrived in Cork late in the evening and managed to find a bed & breakfast. When the lady of the house was showing us the room, the first room after 10 days in which the beds were separate, a fact that made both me and my friend happy, the proprietress suddenly chimed out with that fabulous accent: "Should I push the two beds together in case you want to commit a mortal sin?"
Were we in any way forgiving, we might also mention that the editing and lighting are first-rate, the CGI not shabby, the blocking and cinematography professional, and some of the acting (up until they play "drunk") is mildly good — but who gives a shit when the movie, as a whole, fails so miserably? It actually hurt now and then to see the good points wasted in a movie that was so predictable, so completely unoriginal. Hell, in the first scene that Garda Lisa Nolan (Ruth Bradley) has her coffee prepared by Garda Ciarán O'Shea (Richard Coyle of Outpost: Black Sun[2012 / trailer] and Franklyn[2008]), you already know they're going to end up a couple.
Why? Because the screenplay is by the number and has all the creativity of the pitch that was probably given: "Well, see, we take Tremors(1990 / trailer) and make the graboids into rolling octopuses called grabbers that drink blood, and move the setting from ugly Buttfuck USA to beautiful Buttfuck Ireland because the Irish like to drink and drunks are funny." Whoever green-lighted this thing must have been drunk is all that we can say.
How and why Grabbers gets so many good reviews is beyond us, and actually says less about the quality of the movie than the ease with which the masses are satisfied. Major bomb. Not funny. Total waste of time. Want a good, contemporary monster movie? Go for Tremors — or, with less monster but with a similarly pro-drug attitude (yes, alcohol is a drug), the funny and suspensful teen horror flick, The Faculty (1998 / trailer). Or, if it's jusu suspense you want, Splinter(2008). But skip Grabbers. We sure wish we had.

Zombeavers (USA, 2014)

$
0
0
 
Let's get down to it, you can't really fault a movie with a title like Zombeavers'cause, like what? You expect the directorial talent of Orson Wells and don't find it? You miss the thespian abilities of actors like Meryl Streep or Samuel L. Jackson? The tight scriptwriting of the Coen Brothers? Jesus Christ, we're talking about a movie entitled Zombeavers, not cinematic fine art.
With a title like Zombeavers, you know what you're getting: trash that aims to be brainless, bloody, and funny entertainment. The only question is whether the flick sucks (it doesn't) or is any fun (it is, mostly). Zombeavers might be flawed, and it isn't anywhere near as brilliant as the classic bloodbath comedies Brain Dead (1992 / German trailer), the eternally underrated Tucker & Dale vs. Evil(2010), or even the lesser classic Return of the Living Dead (1985 / trailer), but it is far more fun than tedious and, oddly enough, has a lot of charm. It definitely gets two thumbs up from us.
But then again, we did watch this movie a week after we tortured ourselves with another teen exploiter with an equally ridiculous title, Teenage Caveman(2002), so perhaps our enjoyment of Zombeavers was tempered by the vile experience of the earlier film. Both shared many elements aside from the idiotic titles: young protagonists, exploitive nudity, sex, bad acting, an obvious low budget, violence, and gore. But whereas the older film generated nary a laugh and left us feeling oddly filthy, Zombeavers kept us in a good mood from the go, surprised us more than once, and all its sex and nudity was so ridiculous that it worked more as a source of off-color humor than as ephebophiliac exploitation (the girls at least look like young adults). People may die left and right, but rather unlike Teenage Caveman, Zombeavers isn't really a mean movie — despite scenes like that of a bloodily bitten-off male appendage of personality-forming importance.
The plot is typically mundane: three college gal-pals of equal attractiveness but varying annoyance, Mary (Rachel Melvin of Boo[2005]), Zoe (Cortney Palm of Silent Night [2012 / trailer]), and Jenn (Lexi Atkins), depart for a weekend alone at a cabin owned by Mary's cousin located next to a beaver-damned lake. Though meant as weekend for the gals, boyfriends current and soon-to-be past, Buck (Hutch Dano), Tommy (Jake Weary of Altitude [2012 / trailer] and It Follows [2014 / trailer]), and Sam (Peter Gilroy), show up and the fodder number rises to six college students, plus two neighbors, a dog or two, and a local hunter, Smyth (Rex Linn). As for the beavers, a funny pre-credit sequence reveals their origin: the typical lost canister of some mysterious chemical.
In other words, nothing overly creative or new about the basic setting, but the fun comes with what they do within this generic framework. The opening scene leading up to the loss of the canister, for example, has some surprisingly intelligent and funny dialog culminating in a bumper full of blood. This in turn segues into a surprisingly well-made credit sequence (inspired, perhaps by the credit sequence of Catch Me If You Can [2002 / trailer]) which, combined with the prologue opening scene, does a lot to raise one's expectations.
True, when then we meet our heroines we are promptly confronted with acting and dialogue so bad that one fears that the worst expectations might prove founded, but luckily the next relatively weak 10 minutes fly past quickly enough and Zombeavers catches the curve and becomes surprisingly entertaining and enjoyable. And best of all: it is ridiculously funny without being completely stupid.
Though there are a few highpoints of gore humor — e.g., the ending of the opening sequence, a lesbian-come-on scene gone wrong, and the previously mentioned male appendage scene — Zombeavers is far less bloody than it could've been. In general, but for the prolog conversation between the two delivery men losers, the situational or visual jokes work better than those based on dialog. Logic doesn't really play all that important of a role, and all characterization is based cardboard stereotypes and archetypes, but had the film concentrated on either it would probably have been far less entertaining.
A major plus point is the total lack of CGI and, in turn, reliance on entertainingly cheesy animatronic models for the beavers, which in all truth are about as convincing as the rug-wearing dogs in the trash classic, The Killer Shrews(1959). (Unlike in that entertaining flick, however, the beavers here aren't meant to be taken seriously.) About the only times the effects don't really work on either a cheesy or gory level are in the nighttime scenes of a yard full of glowing eyes: here, the achieved look actually looks as if it were not intentional.
As a whole, Zombeavers's 77 minutes go by at a pleasant pace. The film doesn't overstay its welcome, but also doesn't feel rushed. The narrative just throws in everything expected (and a few things more) without meandering. Most of the humor won't win any awards, but as puerile as it often is, it still makes you laugh, giggle, or at least smile, even as you cringe at the thought of what is transpiring. And for being such one-note characters, a few actually become likeable; something due, perhaps, to the fact that as characters, most seem to actually care about each other.
Zombeavers: the title reveals the intelligence of the concept, but not how much fun the movie is. There are better blood-drenched zomcoms there — re: Peter Jackson's Brain Dead — but this one here is perfectly acceptable for a fun evening. Grab the beer, chips, and joint and enjoy a movie that delivers exactly what it promises. (How often does that happen in this modern world?)

Trailers of Promise: Mad Monster Party (USA, 1967)

$
0
0
Directed by Jules Bass. Jules Bass (born 16 September 1935) was one half of Rankin/Bass Productions, Inc., a US American production he founded on September 14, 1960, as Videocraft International, with his partner Arthur Rankin, Jr. (19 July 1924—30, Jan 2014). Rankin/Bass specialized in stop-motion features (usually for TV) made using their self-named "Animagic" technique, though they also made an occasional live action or traditional animated movie. Most baby-boomers and elder Gen-Xers are familiar with one or another of their movies, above all the 1964 stop-motion TV production Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (remix trailer), which was at one point as much of an annual TV tradition as the annual broadcast of The Wizard of Oz (1939 / trailer). [As we no longer live the US, we have no idea if either film is still a traditional annual broadcast.]
Trailer to
Mad Monster Party:
Mad Monster Party is one of their rare stop-motion, feature-film productions, starring the voices (and likenesses) Boris Karloff and Phyllis Diller. The project was probably spurred by the TV popularity of campy monsters, as exemplified by series such as The Addams Family (1964-66) and The Munsters (1964-66). The great Harvey Kurtzman, of Madmagazine and EC comics, had a hand in writing the script; popular if unsupported rumor has Forrest J. Ackerman involved in the script as well. Interesting trivia: this was the last project associated with Frankenstein that Boris Karloff took part in, 36 years after gaining fame by playing the monster in James Whale’s Frankenstein (1931 / trailer).
This movie seems to now be a popular cult film, but we only stumbled upon it a few weeks ago. And while the trailer does pique our interest, it is the two music videos found further below that really make us want to see the movie. After years of neglect, within the last decade it has enjoyed a couple of remastered releases on DVD, most recently by Lionsgate. The film was released on Blu-ray on September 4, 2012.
Mad Monster Party:
The plot, as found at TCM: "Aging Baron Boris von Frankenstein (Karloff), who lives on a Caribbean island with his monster, his wife (Phyllis Diller of The Boneyard[1991]), and his ward, Francesca (Gale Garnett of The Children [1980 / trailer]), discovers the secret of total destruction, thus completing research that began with the discovery of the secret of creation. He decides to hold a convention for the world's most renowned monsters so that he may choose a successor to lead the Worldwide Organization of Monsters and to inherit his secret. The guests include Dracula, The Werewolf, the Creature from the Black Lagoon, It, Yetch (a Peter Lorre characterization), The Invisible Man (as played by Claude Rains), Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Mummy, Quasimodo (as played by Charles Laughton), and King Kong. Felix Flanken (Allen Swift), Frankenstein's supposedly normal nephew, kept in ignorance of the proceedings, falls in love with Francesca, unaware that she is one of his uncle's mechanical creations. Intrigue follows intrigue as the monsters try to surpass one another to gain the prestigious position. Francesca meets with a surprise when Felix's identity is revealed."
In 1972, Rankin/Bass released the animation TV movie The Mad, Mad, Mad Monsters (1972 / trailer), a prequel of sorts to the original. The soundtrack was released in 1998 by Percepto.
The Mummy 
by Little Tibia and the Fibias

Short Film: How to Undress in Front of Your Husband (USA, 1937)

$
0
0
Poster thanks to The Cinema Masochist.

"I think this worry is about over, though. In a few moments, Trixie will fold up like a dump truck and call it a day. Yes, I was right. The dreadnought is about to drop anchor."
Narrator (Albert Van Antwerp)

Another early "educational" blast from the past by those classic purveyors of road show sleaze, the great Dwain Esper (director) and his wife, Hildegarde Stadie ("adaptation"), the dynamic duo who also brought us one of our favorite "guilty pleasures", Maniac (1934). Maniac was one of the many movies we saw in 2013, and one of the select few that made it to our list of Ten Best in 2013. (And what a list it was, that year!) We even recommended this short here in our review of that slab of sublime celluloid trash, but we feel it time to finally present How to Undress in Front of Your Husband as our Film of the Month.Hard to believe that something this quaint was ever considered scandalous. It was made the same year as Esper & Stadie's other "educational" short How to Take a Bath, which, aside from supposedly featuring the same two leads, has entered the realm of the Lost Film (please check your attic).
Enjoy of Short Film of the Month for March 2016 —
How to Undress in Front of Your Husband:
As Dangerous Minds explains it, "The short film you’re about to take a look at is more than just a cheap, extraordinarily sexist exploitation film from 1937. Indeed, How to Undress in Front of Your Husband is most certainly that, but if you can put the stupidity of the attitudes expressed in the film aside momentarily, you’ll notice that it also happens to be surrounded by a bunch of weird, perhaps even interesting facts. Case in point: It involves the huckster distributer of  Reefer Madness (1936 / trailer / full film / remake [2005] trailer) and his salacious screen writing wife, the film bears a mysterious similarity to a LIFE magazine article featuring photos of ex-burlesque stripper, June St. Clair made in the same year, one of the lead characters (such as there are characters) is the fourth wife of John Barrymore and the other lead character was an ahead-of-her-time suffragette."
The wife of John Barrymore, his fourth and last, is of course Elaine Barrie (née Jacobs; 16 Jul 1915 — 1 Mar 2003); he was 37 years older and an alcoholic when they married. Her only known feature-film credit is Midnight (1939 / trailer), with her husband; later, she spent many years living as a "designer" on Haiti. 
The other lead character, the full-figured "ahead-of-her-time suffragette" shown above, is Trixie Friganza (born Delia O'Callahan, 29 Nov 1870 — 27 Feb 1955), a one-time popular vaudevillian artist and stage actress who ended her years mostly forgotten and teaching at a convent school, which she also left all her worldly goods. According to Wikipedia, "During the height of her career, she used her fame to promote social, civic, and political issues of importance, such as self-love and the Suffragist movement." Friganza's appearance here is perhaps a bit sad, as it was in the twilight of her career (she was soon forced to retire due to health reasons), and while her (at the time politically incorrect) stage comedy act was built around her physical shortcomings, the film is more than degrading in its treatment of her, a woman who deserves more remembrance than she ever has received.
Trixie Friganza "sings"
The Girl from Honolulu:

Beneath Still Waters (Spain, 2005)

$
0
0
 

Beneath Still Waters is an emphatically serious Spanish-lensed horror movie based on a 1989 novel of the same name by Matthew Costello. The tale is clearly Lovecraftian when reduced to it intrinsic plotline — an unseen evil lowers unseen, biding its time (40 years, actually) to escape and wreak havoc — and possibly even includes aspects that might have made a good movie. But a good movie this is not.
True, there are worse films out there, but there are also many better ones, more memorable ones, more interesting ones. This one here, on the whole, is simply another disappointment from the film's director, Brian Yuzna, who long ago burst onto the horror movie scene with the highly entertaining, flawed and once overly-praised but now unjustly forgotten slice of 80s horror entitled Society (1989 / trailer). Yuzna quickly became (along with Stuart Gordon, with whom he regularly collaborates) one of the great white hopes of contemporary horror, and since his second directorial effort, the bloody but funny sequel Bride of the Re-Animator (1990 / trailer), his activities (as producer, writer and/or director) in the independent horror scene have been extremely regular but uneven. Nevertheless, he remains a name to be respected ... or at least we like to think that, even though we do slowly have our doubts that he'll ever direct another good film that doesn't have "Re-animator" in its title.
Regrettably, Beneath Still Waters, despite some notable shock scenes, a few rare moments of suspense, and some other mildly entertaining aspects, is definitely one of Yuzna's minor works and is also decisively uninteresting. In fact, three days after having watched it, were it not for the notes we took while screening the DVD, we wouldn't be able to remember anything about the movie — other than the fact that some of the special effects (particularly the underwater scenes) are decidedly dodgy, and that Susana (Pilar Soto) reveals, in her mildly memorable nighttime nude scene in which she gets porked and eaten by a half-rotten waterlogged zombie, that her implants are of the unrealistically immobile type. (Really, though: even if you were miserably sad about how your unsung love drowned in a lake, would you stand around when his rotting, partially dismembered body rises out of the water and, instead of running away, let him mount you for a midnight fuck?)
 
The movie opens, like the book, with two young boys going to explore and play in the fenced-off town of Marienbad, which is due to be flooded by the rising waters of the  new damn. But they stumble upon an unexpected cellar full of chained-up people, and soon one person, Mordecai (Patrick Gordon), is freed and one boy is dead — and the movie jumps forward to the present day. The evil freed that day seems to have slumbered all those decades deep beneath the sea, or somewhere, and now, on the eve of the local celebration of the creation of the man-made lake and resulting tourist industry, is suddenly getting ornery.
Why the evil waited so long to get active is never really made clear, but then, there are many aspects of the tale that don't really hold water when looked at. For example, the book that our scuba-diving hero Dan Quarry (Michael McKell of Outpost 3: Rise of the Spetsnaz [2013 / trailer]) and O [2014 / trailer]) decides to throw into the fire to destroy the evil: one can only wonder how he came to know that was the magic solution, and why it wasn't done 40 years earlier by those who originally set out to destroy the evil. (Indeed, they still could have sunk the village, but with the knowledge that the evil was really dead and not just sunken.) And even if the new village possessed having a wild orgy was fun to watch, why were the main characters not likewise possessed? Why is the evil so selective in who it kills along the way — a drunkard, a boyfriend, one diver, but not the others? Seriously: the black demon-gunk in the water is killing people left and right, but when it envelopes scuba-diving Dan he survives unscathed and later only comments about some strong water currents? These are but a few of many "Huh?" questions that arise and never get answered as the meandering tale full disparate and badly integrated horror interludes slowly unfolds to nowhere interesting.
If you get down to it, the best thing about the movie are the babes, none of whom will ever win any acting awards. OK, tertiary character Susana with the immobile boobs is only interesting in that her naked death is grotty but laughable, but main gal-in-danger Clara Borgia (Charlotte Salt of The Hoarder [2015 / trailer]) is a hot tamale, and her mom Teresa Borgia (Raquel Meroño of The Mark [2003 / trailer] and Dagon [2001 / trailer]) is a total MILF. But Beneath Still Waters isn't a soft-core sex film and neither babe gets naked much less has any sex scenes, and while eye candy is always appreciated it doesn't do all that much to make the dullness between the occasional gore interludes all that less boring.
In the end, Beneath Still Waters is a forgettable and pointless movie that really could have been so much more.

Detour (USA, 2003)

$
0
0


"Oh hell woman! It's time you open yo eyes! We're a million miles from dick, Cashie's trippin' and we got some kinda freak stalkin' us! ... and you're tellin' me ... that I'M over-reacting?"
Loopz / Yo-Man (Aaron Buer)

(Spoilers.) Aka Hell's Highway and Cannibal Detour. No, we're not talking about a remake of the 1945 Poverty Row masterpiece Detour(trailer/ full film) directed by Edgar G. Ulmer and starring Tom Neal and Ann Savage, which was already pointlessly remade in 1992 by Wade Williams (starring Tom Neal Jr.). Nor, for that matter, are we talking about the long-forgotten, public domain, pre-code chain gang crime drama from 1932 entitled Hell's Highway (full film) starring a bunch of equally long-forgotten names — Richard Dix (18 July 1893 – 20 Sept 1949), Rochelle Elizabeth Hudson (6 March 1916 – 17 Jan 1972), and C. Henry Gordon (17 June 1883 – 3 Dec 1940), anyone? — and directed by "the largely forgotten"Rowland Brown (6 Nov 1900 – 6 May 1963). The movie at hand here is the totally unknown rip-off of The Hills Have Eyes (1977 / trailer) written and directed by the still-unknown Steve Taylor, and starring a bunch of names that will never be known, much less forgotten. (OK, supposedly cult fave Tiffany Shepis is somewhere in the flick, but we missed her.)
Our DVD says the movie is presented by The Asylum, and indeed it follows the typical Asylum business model of rewriting and remaking bigger-budgeted films to cash in on the publicity of the "real" movie, so in all likelihood Detour is, alone due to the date of its release, more of a rip-off of Wrong Turn (2003 / trailer) than the popular Wes Craven flick that laid the groundwork for both of these and many other movies (and also got remade [trailer] 3 years after this flick here came out).
Here, instead of a typically dysfunctional American family confronted by a family of killer cannibals on their way through the desert — or a variety of young couples in the backwoods of Buttfuck, Nowhere, who run into a family of misshapen killer cannibals — we have a group of over-aged, high-school party animals returning from a desert rave who, when making a detour to find a legendary peyote patch, run into an extended family (?) of peyote-freaking cannibals. (Yep, in the end, Detour is actually an anti-drug film, but it manages to hide its message so effectively that you almost don't notice it.)
To say Detour is a good movie would be a lie. Oddly enough, however, though a mass of badly constructed plot developments, truly crappy make-up, and almost no tension or logic, we sort of found the movie mildly entertaining and almost effective at times in a Z-movie way. We will definitely never watch it again, and would be hard-placed to recommend it, but, well, we can't say we hated it. There were simply a few too many things we sort of enjoyed.
But one thing we really didn't like, however, was the character Loopz aka Lawrence (Aaron Buer), whom we nicknamed "Yo" in our minds: he gains special notice for being the stupidest, most pointless, gangsta-talking white guy ever found in a movie, direct-to-video or not. (That he survives somehow echoes real life: those who deserve to die, never do. Why else is Trump still alive?) The rest of the fodder was, for the most part, far more believable as characters.
Not that there weren't enough other failures in the narrative to induce the occasional unintentional guffaw: our loudest came with the Molotov Cocktail from nowhere, followed by the hilarious glued-on hair of the big bad guy. Aside from guffaws, there are also a good number of groaners in the movie: for example, when Michelle (Jessica Osfar) and Lee (Ryan De'Rouen) go hiking up a hill to try to get a signal for their mobile phones (they have sex, which allows for some tit-flashing, so they die), or when Neil (Brent Taylor of Starkweather[2004 / trailer]) not only drops his gun but runs straight down the middle of the road when being pursued by a pick-up truck instead of suddenly sprinting left or right or off the fucking road (he dies).
OK, so what did we like? Well, the cinematography is occasionally okay and the use of filters effective; also, the opening rave was edited and colored in a manner that (barring the brief intercut scenes of dismemberment) was extremely reminiscent of the X-fused raves we used to go to. And, for a change, the movie managed to believably present the fodder as either friends or acquaintances, and thus their reactions to the given situations sometimes achieved a mild verisimilitude. We also liked that the person with the biggest balls was a woman — Tara (Ashley Reed) — and while it does in the end take the joint effort of the three survivors to survive, she is the driving force. Likewise, the death of Lee was rather funny (and not badly shot), and Michelle's demise did hurt to watch.
Detour gets more things wrong than it gets right and misses many an opportunity to be a better movie, and its low budget is as obvious as its script is full of holes. Still, for a grade-Z movie it passes quickly enough and manages not only not to piss you off too often, but to keep you mildly interested. But don't think we're actually recommending it...
 

"I love big, hairy, man ass!"
Loopz / Yo-Man (Aaron Buer)

Jack Brooks, Monster Slayer (Canada, 2007)

$
0
0

The feature-film directorial début of Canadian director Jon Knautz, the title of this horror comedy is of course an obvious homage to a far more successful movie (1992 / trailer) and series (1997-2003 / trailer) featuring everyone's favorite blonde-haired, ditzy vampire slayer(s). And much like that film, and less like the series, Jack Brooks, Monster Slayer is a mildly diverting piece of fluff that offers occasional entertainment but is far from being either a masterpiece or even imperative viewing. In this regard, perhaps the biggest flaw of the movie — if one ignores the truly embarrassing framing sequence that, while obviously meant as a joke, is far less funny than it is both subconsciously racist and an overt example of the white savior syndrome— is that the flick obviously had so much more potential, and thus comes across as underdeveloped.
The basic plot involves the loser plumber Jack Brooks, who, as a result of being the only survivor when his family was slaughtered by a monster during a childhood camping trip, has some serious anger management problems. By the end of the movie, however, our plumber inadvertently finds a perfect outlet for his inner-anger as well as his purpose in life. And, of course, the film earns its title.

As played by the not unattractive Trevor Matthews, Brooks is more uptight and prone to uncontrolled rants or smoldering silence than he is, say, an entertaining and loquacious buffoon like Ash (see: Army of the Darkness [1992 / trailer]). Thus, though he occasionally does make a drily humorous statement, he is not truly entertaining or particularly likable. Indeed, if he is sympathetic at all, it is because most of those around him — his bitchy blonde girlfriend Eve (Rachel Skarsten of Fear of the Dark [2003 / German trailer]), an annoyingly touchy-feely stoner classmate John (James A. Woods) — are so obnoxiously dislikable. 
But for being such a dud of a personality, the movie spends way too much time on him before finally unleashing the monsters, the gore, the humor, the fun. So, while the movie does feature some amusing horror and monster slaying, particularly 55 minutes into the events, it delivers far less than one is led to expect by the film's title and the DVD's comic-book-like cover. And therein lies the rub that makes the movie so disappointing on the whole.
Giving credit where credit is due, the obviously low-budget movie uses no CGI, relying instead on good old make-up, rubber, and ketchup. The results are variable — the monster of the framing sequence looks like a rubber suit, as does the Jabba-the-Hut-looking demon Prof. Gordon Crowley (Robert Englund) mutates into — but cheesy effects do fit well into horror comedies, this one too. The limited number of mobile demons that Brooks ends up facing off in the high school, on the other hand, are a bit more "realistic" and owe their look more to the possessed of Demons (1985 / trailer) and Demons II (1986 / trailer) than rubber casting.

Whenever the demon shit hits the fan, director Knautz does a good job at keeping everything moving and bloody; indeed, his direction is better than his weak if tightly plotted script. (How tightly plotted? He even explains how the demon heart came to be buried in Prof. Gordon Crowley's back yard. And, actually, the revelation leads up to one of the best dialogue exchanges in the whole film.) And if the various characters are all relatively one-note in nature, the cast is obviously game and give their best across the board. Indeed, Jack Brooks, Monster Slayer comes across as such a labor of love one really ends up wishing that the movie was better than it is. But the simple fact is, it is slow to get moving, the real laughs (like most of the gore) start too late, and most laughs really aren't that deep.

Jack Brooks, Monster Slayer is not that the movie is truly bad, it's just that there are funnier ones out there. We really expected a lot more than it gave, and were thus disappointed. Go in with low expectations, and you will probably actually find it relatively entertaining.

Director Jon Knautz has since gone out to direct a variety of serious (independent) horror feature films — Goddess of Love (2015 / trailer), Girl House (2014 / trailer) and The Shrine (2010 / trailer) — that haven't made waves, but all look interesting.
Used in the movie —
Bobby Darin's Beyond the Sea:

Short Film: Fist of Jesus (Spain, 2012)

$
0
0
When bored, we are likely to search the web using unlikely word combinations such as "Jesus with a boner" or "Zombie Mohammed" (or the inverse) just to see what we discover. While our Mohammed searches generally tend to remain very dry — after all, who wants to get killed for making jokes about a religion that is love personified? — the Jesus results are often rather entertaining, or even informative.
It was one such search, for example, that led us to learn that while Ed D. Louie's legendary and lost gay porn film Him (1974) grabs all the limelight, there is also an unknown and not-lost Danish heterosexual porn film out there entitled I Saw Jesus Die / Jeg så Jesus dø (1975). (It, too, is now on our list of "Films to See", though not high on it.)
And it was another such search that brought us to find our Short Film of the Month for April 2016, Fist of Jesus. This roughly 15-minute-long Spanish gore film from Adrián Cardona and David Muñoz has reaped in the awards (76 according to the film's website), but for that it seems oddly unknown for a flick with such a great concept, so much gore, and so many giggles. The basic plot involves Jesus' (Marc Velasco) resurrection of Lazarus (Roger Sotera) going all wrong, and how he and his pal Judas (Noé Blancafort) have to set things right. As the website El Gore aptly says, what we have here is an "ultra-violent Peter Jackson (the Braindead [1992 / trailer] / Bad Taste [1987 / trailer] / Meet the Feebles [1989 / trailer] era) reboot version of Monty Python's Life of Brian (1979 / trailer)".
The supposed goal of the filmmakers is to eventually make a feature-length version of the tale, but at the moment they seem content simply rolling out anything they can think of along the product chain (e.g., trading cards, game, t-shirts, etc.).
Fist of Jesus:
In any event, as Horror News puts it: "It's Jesus like you've never seen him before in a short film that's sure to piss off a few churchgoers, but hey………… it's great fun and impressive work, none-the-less!" And something that would surely have cost the two filmmakers their lives had they used a different prophet as their main character.
As an extra:
Jesus Will Survive — Jesus Christ! The Musical:

Viewing all 690 articles
Browse latest View live